Investigation of teachers' educational technology standards self-efficacy
The main purpose of the research is to investigate educational technology standards self-efficacy (ETSSE) of teachers. Quantitative research methods, namely he survey and correlational (prediction) research designs, were used in the study. The participants of the research are constituted of teachers (n=419) who served at secondary (n=10) and high schools (n=6) in the nearby districts of Diyarbakır, in the spring semester of 2014-2015 academic year. While no significant differences were found in the ETSSE and all sub-dimension mean scores with regard to level of school teachers serve in, teaching experience and their degree of learning, the scores of ETSSE significantly differentiated in terms of teachers' gender and branches. According to the regression analysis, the attitudes towards using technology in education and level of developing materials for lessons had the most important relation in explaining ETSSE scores (R=.47; Adjusted R2=.22; p=.00). When the views of the teachers are investigated with regard to their ICT usage: in planning and preparation for the course, in designing the course content, in the course of instruction, measurement and evaluation process; ETSSE scores were differentiated in support of the teachers who used ICT in all the process of the lessons than the others who used ICT in one or two different processes.
Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları: Sık kullanılan istatistiksel analizler ve açıklamalı SPSS çözümleri. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür & Yayıncılık.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-ef-cacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, H. J. (2001, April). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the 2001 Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. Retrieved from https://www.stcloudstate.edu/tpi/initiative/documents/technology/How%20Are%20Teachers%20Using%20Computers%20in%20Instruction.pdf
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Cennamo, K. S., Ross, J. D. & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards based approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. Ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Çağlar, E. (2012). The integration of innovative new media technologies into education: FATIH project in Turkey and ISTE'S teacher standards. Educational Sciences and Practice, 11(21), 47-67.
Çakır, R., & Oktay, S. (2013). Bilgi toplumu olma yolunda öğretmenlerin teknoloji kullanımları. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 35-54.
Çoklar, N. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim teknolojisi standartları ile ilgili özyeterliklerinin belirlenmesi. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Anadolu University, Turkey.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Göktaş, Y., Yıldırım, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (1), 193'204.
Güler, N. (2011). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Ilgaz, H., & Usluel, Y. (2011). Öğretim sürecine BİT entegrasyonu açısından öğretmen yeterlikleri ve mesleki gelişim. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 10(19), 87- 106.
International Society for Technology in Education (2014). ISTE and the ISTE Standards. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards
Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., Odabaşı, H. F., Kılıçer, K., Çoklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2014). Constructing technopedagogical education based on teacher competencies in terms of national standards. Elementary Education Online, 13(4), 1185 - 1202.
Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (15. Ed). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2008). Öğretmen yetiştirme ve eğitimi genel müdürlüğü. Öğretmen yeterlikleri: öğretmenlik mesleği genel ve özel alan yeterlikleri. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
Orhan, D., Kurt, A. A., Ozan, Ş., Som Vural, S., &Türkan, F. (2015). A holistic view to national educational technology standards. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2014), 65-79.
Özcan, M. (2013). Okulda Üniversite: Türkiye'de öğretmen eğitimini yeniden yapılandırmak için bir model önerisi. (TÜSİAD-T/2013-12/543). İstanbul: TÜSİAD.
Özsoy, S., & Özsoy, G. (2013). Effect size reporting in educational research. Elementary Education Online, 12(2), 334-346.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (3rd Ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press and McGraw Hill Education.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Horizon, 9, 1'6.
Şimşek, Ö. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi öz-yeterliğinin uluslararası eğitim teknolojisi standartları (ISTE-T 2008) bağlamında incelenmesi. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Dicle University, Turkey.
Simsek, O., & Yazar, T. (2016). Education Technology Standards Self-Efficacy (ETSSE) Scale: A validity and reliability study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 63, 311-334, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.14689/ejer.2016.63.18
Şirin, E. F. & Duman, S. (2013). An investigation of educational technology standarts of physical education candidate teachers in terms of several variables. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10(1), 1298-1313.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59, 134'144.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher ef-cacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783'805. doi:10.1016/S0742'051X(01)00036-1.
Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2014). Öğretmenlerin bilişim teknolojilerini kullanmaya yönelik davranışlarının modellenmesi. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Gazi University, Turkey.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2010). 21st century skills discussion paper. Netherlands: Universiteit Twente.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321.
Yükseköğretim Kurulu/Dünya Bankası (1999). Türkiye'de öğretmen eğitiminde standartlar ve akreditasyon: Milli Eğitimi geliştirme projesi hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi. Ankara: YÖK. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/12924/turkiyede_ogretmen_egitiminde_standartl arla_ve_akreditasyon.pdf/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I accept that the owner of PEGEGOG, the editor, associate editors, reviewers and the scientific committee cannot be hold responsible regarding the scope, the findings, the discussion and conclusion of the manuscript submitted.
I declare to the editorship of PEGEGOG that the manuscript is original and has not been published anywhere else or is not under evaluation process for any other journal.
I approve that I grant PEGEGOG as the sole and exclusive right and license to publish for the full legal term of copyright of my manuscript concurring with article 5846 / 22-23-25 while I retain copyright in the work.