Investigating the effects of personality traits on cyberbullying

  • Ali Semerci TNP, Document Management Department
Keywords: Cyberbullying, Personality traits, Structural Regression Model


Cyberbullying is a complicated and multifaceted phenomenon especially among youngsters, thus understanding the determinants of cyberbullying is prominent to explain what causes youngsters experience cyberbullying. Since little is known about the link between personality traits and cyberbullying, the current study aimed to explore the effects of vocational high school students' personality traits on their cyberbullying behaviors. In this regard, "Cyber victim/bully Scale", and "Adjective Based Personality Scale" were administered to 246 participant students. A structural regression model was developed with predictor variables and tested to see the effects of personality traits on cyberbullying. The goodness of fit indices indicated acceptable fitness (χ2/df:2.63, RMSEA: .08, GFI: .55, AGFI: .53, CFI: .61, IFI: .61). The results illustrated that openness is the strongest significant predictor of both cyberbullying (R2=-.83, p<.05) and being bullied (R2=-.77, p<.05). Yet another significant but positive predictor of cyberbully is extroversion (R2=.54, p<.05). However, the weakest positive significant predictor of cyberbully is agreeableness (R2=.14, p<.05). In addition to openness, conscientiousness was also found to be another significant predictor of being bullied (R2=.64, p<.05). Surprisingly, neuroticism has no significant effect on cyberbullying and being bullied.


Download data is not yet available.


Arıcak, O. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 34, 167-184.

Arseneault, L., Bowes, L., & Shakoor, S. (2010). Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: 'Much ado about nothing'? Psychological Medicine, 40, 717'729. DOI:

Ayas, T. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinin sanal zorba ve kurban olma yaygınlığı. 11. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi Bildirisi, Ege Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, İzmir, Türkiye.

Ayas, T. & Horzum, M. B. (2010). Cyberbully/victim scale development study. Akademik Bakış, 19, 1-17.

Aydın, M. K., Bavlı, B., & Alcı, B. (2013). Examining the effects of pre-service teachers' personality traits on their teaching competencies. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5 (3), 575-586.

Bacanlı, H., İlhan, T., & Aslan, S. (2009). Beş factör kuramına dayalı bir kişilik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Sıfatlara dayalı kişilik testi (SDKT). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (2), 261-279.

Batigun, A.D. & Hasta, D. (2010). Internet addiction: An evaluation in terms of loneliness and interpersonal relationship styles. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 11 (3), 213-219.

Belsey, B. (2012). Internet usage: Facts and news. Retrieved July 22, 2015, from

Campbell, M. (2005). The impact of the mobile phone on young people's social life. Paper presented to the Social Change in the 21st Century Conference. Centre for Social Change Research Queensland University of Technology.

Cassidy W., Faucher, C., & Jackson M. (2013). Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psychology International, 34 (6), 575-612. DOI:

Chadwick, S. (2014). SpringerBriefs in Education. Impacts of Cyberbullying, Building Social and Emotional Resilience in Schools. 201410.1007/978-3-319-04031-8_2. DOI:

Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N., Kim, T., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65-83. DOI:

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.

Çelik, S., Atak, H., & Erguzen, A. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi [Eurasian Journal of Educational Research], 49, 129-150.

Çetin, B., Yaman, E., & Peker, A. (2011). Cyber victim and bullying scale: A study of validity and reliability. Computers &Education, 57 (4), 2261-2271. DOI:

Gleason, K. A., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Richardson, D. (2004). Agreeableness as a predictor of aggression in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 43-61. DOI:

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229. DOI:

Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J.W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Neither an epidemic nor a rarity. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9 (5), 539'543. DOI:

Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29 (2), 129-156. DOI:

Horzum, M.B. & Ayas, T. (2014). Orta öğretim öğrencilerin psikolojik belirtilere göre sanal zorba ve sanal mağdur düzeylerinin yordanması. Online Journal of Technology Addiction &Cyberbullying, 1 (2), 21-36.

Hu, L. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55. DOI:

Jackson, M., Cassidy, W., & Brown, K. (2009). Out of the mouth of babes: Students' voice their opinions on cyberbullying. Long Island Educ Rev, 8, 24'30.

Juvonen, J. & Gross, E. (2008). Extending the school grounds? eBullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496-505. DOI:

Kemp, S. (2016). Digital in 2016 Special Reports. Retrieved December 08, 2016, from

Kim, J., LaRose, R., & Peng, W. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic internet use: The relationship between internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12 (4), 451-455. DOI:

Klomek, A.B., Sourander, A., Niemela, S., Kumpulainen, K., Piha, J., Tamminen, T., Almqvist, F., & Gould, M.S. (2009). Childhood bullying behaviors as a risk for suicide attempts and completed suicides: A population-based birth cohort study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 254'261. DOI:

Kowalski, R. M. & Limber, P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 522-530. DOI:

Li, K.T. (2011). A Study of relationship between cyber-bullying and personality of the elders at Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Master's Thesis. Retrieved February 23, 2015, from

Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimization. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23 (4), 435-454. DOI:

Lonigro, A., Schneider, B. H., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., Pallini, S., & Brunner, T. (2015). Is cyberbullying related to trait or state anger? Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46, 445'454. DOI:

Marees, v.N. & Petermann, F. (2012). Cyberbullying: An increasing challenge for schools. School Psychology International, 33 (5) 467-476.

Mason, K. L. (2008). Cyberbullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 45 (4), 323-348. DOI:

Mayor, J.D. (2007). Asserting the definition of personality. The Online Newsletter for Personality Science, 1, 1-4.

McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T.J. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J.S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford.

McCrae, R.R. & John, O.P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175'215. DOI:

Meydan, C.H. & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ve AMOS uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

Morahan-Martin, J. & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 659'671. DOI:

Patchin, J.W. & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4 (2), 148-169. DOI:

Price, M. & Dalgleish, J. (2010). Cyberbullying experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia, 29 (2), 51-59.

Randler, C., Horzum, M.B., & Vollmer, C. (2014). Internet addiction and its relationship to chronotype and personality in a Turkish university student sample. Social Science Computer Review, 32(4), 484-495. DOI:

Raskauskas, J. & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564-575. DOI:

Roberts, B.W. & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17 (1), 31-35. DOI:

Seeley, K., Tombari, M. L., Bennett, L. J., & Dunkle, J. B. (2009). Peer victimization in schools: A set of quantitative and qualitative studies of the connections among peer victimization, school engagement, truancy, school achievement, and other outcomes. National Center for School Engagement, 1, 13-46.

Srivastava, A., Gamble, R., & Boey J. (2013). Cyberbullying in Australia: Clarifying the problem, considering the solutions. TheInternational Journal of Children's Rights, 21, 25-45. DOI:

Tani, F., Greenman, P. S., Schneider, B. H., & Fregoso, M. (2003). Bullying and the Big Five: A study of childhood personality and participant role in bullying incidents. School Psychology International, 24, 131-146. DOI:

Türk Dil Kurumu [TDK] (2016). Kişilik. Bilim ve sanat terimleri. Retrieved December 09, 2016, from

Turkish Statistical Institute Household Information Technologies Usage Survey [TUİK] (2015). Retrieved December 07, 2016, from

Willard, N. (2005). Cyberbullying and cyber threats. OSDFS National Conference. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from

How to Cite
Semerci, A. (2017). Investigating the effects of personality traits on cyberbullying. Pegem Eğitim Ve Öğretim Dergisi, 7(2), 211-230.