Organizational flexibility of Turkish universities: Evaluations in the institutional reports of European University Association

  • Barış Uslu Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Keywords: Organizational flexibility, Turkish universities, Institutional evaluation reports, European University Association

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the level of organizational flexibility in Turkish universities. The institutional evaluation reports of the European University Association (EUA) related to Turkish universities were used as the data sources. The EUA's reports of 14 universities were selected by taking the locations and dates of their reports into consideration. The research was then designed in a case study pattern, as a qualitative inquiry. During the analysis of the EUA's reports, descriptive thematic analysis was carried out. According to the findings, it can be said that the general level of organizational flexibility in Turkish public universities is not high, as in their institutional autonomy level calculated by the EUA. It seems that financial autonomy initiates the formation of strategy flexibility in universities, and conformable rules and regulations of national higher education provide room to universities for precept and managerial flexibility. The stronger organizational flexibility will then provide a greater university autonomy in terms of financial, managerial, employment, and academic autonomy. Based on these results, several recommendations are proposed to higher education policy makers, as well as to university managers in Turkey.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adonisi, M., & van Wyk, R. (2012). The influence of market orientation, flexibility and job satisfaction on corporate entrepreneurship. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 11 (5), 477-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v11i5.6966

Akgeyik, T. (2013). Ulusal ve uluslararası karşılaştırmalarla öğretim üyeliği maaşı. Ankara: SETA Report.

Aktan, C. C. (2007). Yüksek öğretimde değişim: Global trendler ve yeni yaklaşımlar. In C. C. Aktan (Ed.), Değişim çağında yüksek öğretim (pp. 1-43). İzmir: Yaşar Üniversitesi Yayını.

Aypay, A. (Ed.). (2015). Türkiye'de yükseköğretim: Alanı, kapsamı ve politikaları. Ankara: Pegem.

Barblan, A., Ergüder, Ü., & Gürüz, K. (2008). Higher education in Turkey: Institutional autonomy and responsibility in a modernising society. Bologna: Bononia University Press.

Boonstra, J. J. (2004). Dynamics of organizational change and learning: An introduction. In. J. J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning: Wiley Handbooks in the Psychology of Management in Organizations (pp. 1-42). Chichester: Wiley Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753408.ch1

Ceylan, C. (2001). Örgütler için esneklik performans modeli oluşturulması ve örgütlerin esneklik analizi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Chan, R. Y. (2012). The limits of organizational change: Developing and embracing institutional change and flexibility in higher education organizations. Unpublished paper, Lynch Graduate School of Education, Boston College, USA.

Chapman, D. W., & Austin, A. E. (2002). The changing context of higher education in the developing world. In D. W. Chapman & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Higher education in developing world: Changing contexts and institutional responses (pp. 3-22). Boston College: The Center for Higher Education and the Program in Higher Education.

Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.

Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education Management, 13 (2), 9-24.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Çalık, T., & Bumin-Süzen, Z. (2013) Avrupa Üniversiteler Birliği kurumsal değerlendirme raporlarında yer alan tespitler ve öğretim üyelerinin iyileştirme önerilerine katılım düzeyleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 19 (3), 355-390.

Çelik, Z., & Gür, B. S. (2014). Yükseköğretim sistemlerinin yönetimi ve üniversite özerkliği: Küresel eğilimler ve Türkiye örneği. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 4 (1), 18-27. doi:10.5961/jhes.2014.085

Çetinsaya, G. (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararasılaşma: Türkiye Yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Basımevi.

Çınar, F., & Ağcakaya, S. (2016). Yükseköğretimin finansmanında alternatif stratejiler: Dünyadaki uygulamalar ve Türkiye'de mevcut durum üzerinden karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23 (1), 269-289.

Efe, I., & Ozer, O. (2015). A corpus-based discourse analysis of the vision and mission statements of universities in Turkey. Higher Education Research & Development, 34 (6), 1110-1122. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1070127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1070127

Erdem, A. R. (2013). Üniversite özerkliği: Mali, akademik ve yönetsel açıdan yaklaşım. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 3 (2), 97-107. doi:10.5961/jhes.2013.064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2013.064

Erkan, S. (2011). Change in higher education and a core value: Academic freedom. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17 (3), 349-376.

EUA. (2015a). Institutional Evaluation Programme. Retrieved January 27, 2015, from http://www.eua.be/activities-services/institutional-evaluation-programme.aspx

EUA. (2015b). Who has participated in IEP. Retrieved February 21, 2015, from http://www.eua.be/activities-services/institutional-evaluation-programme/who-has-participated/ iep-evaluation-reports.aspx

EUA. (2015c). University autonomy in Europe. Retrieved March 13, 2015, from http://www.university-autonomy.eu/

EUA. (2015d). EUA Members Directory. Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://www.eua.be/about/members-directory?country=212

Gündeğer, C., Soysal, S., & Yağcı, E. (2012). ÖYP araştırma görevlilerinin yurt içi ve yurt dışı dil eğitimlerine ilişkin görüşleri. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 2 (4), 55-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/C2S4M5

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2015). Eğitim yönetimi: Teori, araştırma ve uygulama (S. Turan (Ed.), Trans. from 7th Ed.). Ankara: Nobel. (Original work published 2005)

Kohtamäki, V., & Lyytinen, A. (2004). Financial autonomy and challenges to being a regionally responsive higher education institution. Tertiary Education and Management, 10 (4), 319-338. doi:10.1080/13583883.2004.9967135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2004.9967135

Kondakci, Y., & van den Broeck, H. (2009). Institutional imperatives versus emergent dynamics: A case study on continuous change in higher education. Higher Education, 58 (4), 439-464. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9204-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9204-2

Kurt, T., & Gümüş, S. (2015). Dünyada yükseköğretimin finansmanına ilişkin eğilimler ve Türkiye için öneriler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 5 (1), 14-26. doi:10.5961/jhes.2015.105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.105

Lewis, D. R., Hendel, D. D., & Kallsen, L. (2007). Performance indicators as a foundation of institutional autonomy: Implications for higher education institutions in Europe. Tertiary Education and Management, 13 (3), 203-226. doi:10.1080/13583880701502158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701502158

Maldonado, C. M. (2003). Flexibility and change: Creating an organizational structure to support transformation at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Long Beach, USA.

Mensah, Y. M, & Werner, R. (2003). Cost efficiency and financial flexibility in institutions of higher education. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22 (4), 293-323. doi:10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00036-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00036-X

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Özcan, D., & Çakır, H. (2016). Üniversite-toplum, devlet, piyasa/sermaye ilişkileri bağlamında üniversite özerkliği. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6 (1), 31-40. doi:10.5961/jhes.2016.140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2016.140

Özden, Y. (2005). Egitimde yeni degerler (6th ed.). Ankara: Pegem.

Özkan, M., & Gedikoğlu, T. (2014). Türk yükseköğretim finansmanına ilişkin görüşler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 4 (2), 99-111. doi:10.5961/jhes.2014.093

Özoğlu, M., Gür, B. S., & Gümüs, S. (2016). Rapid expansion of higher education in Turkey: The challenges of recently established public universities (2006'2013). Higher Education Policy, 29 (1), 21-39. doi:10.1057/hep.2015.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.7

Öztürk, S. (2006). Üniversite özerkliği göstergeleri üzerine bir değerlendirme. Eğitim Bilim Toplum, 16 (4), 114-145.

Rosa, M. J., Cardoso, S., Dias, D., & Amaral, A. (2011). The EUA Institutional Evaluation Programme: An account of institutional best practices. Quality in Higher Education, 17 (3), 369-386. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.625207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2011.625207

Skorstad, E. J., & Ramsdal, H. (2009). Flexible organizations and the new working life: A European perspective. Surrey: Ashgate.

Stefani, L. (2008). Change management and a model of distributed leadership in the context of academic development. Educational Developments, 9 (3), 19-22.

Süngü, H. (2013). Akademisyen ücretlerine ilişkin karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Turkish Studies, 8 (8), 1187-1205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.5470

Uslu, B. (2015). Communication, climate and managerial flexibility regarding scholarly practices in universities, and faculty's academic intellectual leadership: A structural equation modelling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey.

Uslu, B. (2016a). Managerial flexibility regarding scholarly practices scale: Validity and reliability studies in university environment. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 22 (1), 109-131. doi:10.14527/kuey.2016.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2016.005

Uslu, B. (2016b). Üniversitelerde bilimsel-sosyal uygulamalara ilişkin yönetsel esneklik: Öğretim üyelerinin algılarındaki farklılıklar. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6 (2), 220-230. doi:10.5961/jhes.2016.158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2016.158

Uslu, B., & Arslan, H. (2015). Faculty's academic intellectual leadership: Predictive relations with several organizational characteristics of universities. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 5 (2), 125-135. doi:10.5961/jhes.2015.115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.115

Visakorpi, J., Stankovic, F., Pedrosa, J., & Rozsnyai, C. (2008). Higher education in Turkey: Trends, challenges, opportunities ' Observations and recommended actions on the higher education system based on seventeen institutional evaluation reports of Turkish universities. İstanbul: TÜSİAD.

Yamaç, K. (2009). Bilgi toplumu ve üniversiteler. Ankara: Eflatun.

YÖK. (2016a). Yükseköğretim istatistikleri. Retrieved June 09, 2016, from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/

YÖK. (2016b). Mevlana Değişim Programı. Retrieved June 09, 2016, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/mevlana

YÖK. (2016c). Bölgesel Kalkınma Odaklı Misyon Farklılaşması ve İhtisaslaşması Projesi. Retrieved December 30, 2016, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/guest/ihtisaslasma-ve-bolgesel-kalkinma-belirlenen-5-universite

YÖK. (2016d). Yükseköğretim Kurulu ilgili mevzuatı. Retrieved December 30, 2016, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/guest/mevzuat;jsessionid=A02538A73DFF771B5E1CF2F8857218E2

YKK. (2016). Yükseköğretim Kalite Kurulu ilgili mevzuatı. Retrieved December 30, 2016, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/kalitekurulu

Published
2017-04-08
How to Cite
Uslu, B. (2017). Organizational flexibility of Turkish universities: Evaluations in the institutional reports of European University Association. Pegem Eğitim Ve Öğretim Dergisi, 7(2), 231-256. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.009