Facilitative and hindering factors regarding the supervisory relationship based on supervisors’ and undergraduate supervisees’ opinions

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine Turkish counseling supervisors’ and undergraduate supervisees’ opinions about the supervisory relationship. Upon completion of Individual Counseling Practice course, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with four voluntary supervisors (two female and two male) and their four voluntary undergraduate supervisees (four female) in a case study design. Content analysis results revealed three main categories of supervisors’ and supervisees’ opinions on the supervisory relationship: a) facilitative factors, b) hindering factors, and c) effects. The findings were discussed in the light of the relevant literature and recommendations regarding developing strong supervisory relationship with undergraduate supervisees are presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aladağ, M. & Bektaş, D. Y. (2009). Examining individual-counseling practicum in a Turkish undergraduate counseling program. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 37(4), 53–70.
Aladağ, M. & Kemer, G. (2016). Psikolojik danışman eğitiminde bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulamasının ve süpervizyonunun incelenmesi. İzmir, Türkiye: Ege Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Müdürlüğü.
Aladağ, M. (2014). Psikolojik danışman eğitiminin farklı düzeylerinde bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulaması süpervizyonunda kritik olaylar. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 428–475.
Atik, G. (2015). Yapılandırılmış akran grup süpervizyonu sürecinin psikolojik danışman adaylarının psikolojik danışma öz-yeterlik düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisi. Paper presented at the annual National Conference of Guidance and Counseling, Mersin, Turkey.
Atik, G., Çelik, E. G., Güç, E., & Tutal, N. (2016). Psikolojik danışman adaylarının yapılandırılmış akran grup süpervizyonu sürecindeki metafor kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(2), 597-619.
Atik, Z. (2017). Psikolojik danışman adaylarının bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulaması ve süpervizyonuna ilişkin değerlendirmeleri. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Atlas of Undergraduate Programs. (2017). Rehberlik ve psikolojik danışmanlık programı bulunan tüm üniversiteler. Retrieved from https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10172
Bang, K. & Park, J. (2009). Korean supervisors’ experiences in clinical supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(8), 1042-1075. doi: 10.1177/0011000009339341
Beinart, H. (2014). Building and sustaining the supervisory relationship. In C. E. Watkins & D. L. Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 257-281). doi: 10.1002/9781118846363.ch11
Bernard, J. M. & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (4th ed.) MA: Pearson.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. USA: Allyn and Bacon.
Borders, L. D., Bernard, J. M., Dye, H. A., Fong, M. L., Henderson, P., & Nance, D. W. (1991). Curriculum guide for training counseling supervisors: Rationale, development, and implementation. Counselor Education and Supervision, 31(1), 61-78. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1991.tb00371.x
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252-260. doi: 10.1037/h0085885
Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(1), 35- 42. doi: 10.1177/0011000083111007
Borsay, C. (2012). Understanding the supervisory relationship and what happens when difficulties occur. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, University of Oxford, USA.
Bradley, L. J. & Ladany, N. (2001). Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
Büyükgöze-Kavas, A. (2011). Bireysel ve grupla psikolojik danışma uygulamalarına yönelik bir değerlendirme. Turkish Education Sciences Journal, 9(2), 411-432.
Campbell, J. M. (2000). Becoming an effective supervisor: A workbook for counselor and psychotherapist. USA: Routledge.
Cheon, H. S., Blumer, M. L., Shih, A. T., Murphy, M. J., & Sato, M. (2009). The influence of supervisor and supervisee matching, role conflict, and supervisory relationship on supervisee satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(1), 52-67. doi: 10.1007/s10591-008-9078-y
Clohessy, S. (2008). Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships: a qualitative analysis. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, University of Hull, USA.
Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) (2016). 2016 CACREP standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
Denizli, S., Aladağ, M., Bektaş, D. Y., Cihangir-Çankaya, Z., & Özeke-Kocabaş, E. (2009). Psikolojik danışman eğitiminde bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulaması ve süpervizyonu: Ege Üniversitesi Örneği. Paper presented at the annual National Conference of Guidance and Counseling, Adana, Turkey.
Doğan, S. (2000).The historical development of counseling in Turkey. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 22, 57–67. doi: 10.1023/A:1005474126819
Ellis, M. V. & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447-507). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Ellis, M. V. (2010). Bridging the science and practice of clinical supervision: Some discoveries, some misconceptions. The Clinical Supervisor, 29(1), 95-116. doi: 10.1080/07325221003741910
Falender, C. A. & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fong, M. L., Borders, L. D., Ethington, C. A., & Pitts, J. H. (1997). Becoming a counselor: A longitudinal study of student cognitive development. Counselor Education and Supervision, 37(2), 100-114. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1997.tb00536.x
Frost, K. (2004). A longitudinal exploration of the supervisory relationship: A qualitative study. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, University of Oxford, USA.
Heckman-Stone, C. (2004). Trainee preferences for feedback and evaluation in clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 22(1), 21-33. doi: 10.1300/J001v22n01_03
Hilton, D. B., Russell, R. K., & Salmi, S. W. (1995). The effects of supervisor's race and level of support on perceptions of supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73(5), 559-563. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01794.x
Holloway, E. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Sage Publications.
Horrocks, S. & Smaby, M. H. (2006). The supervisory relationship: Its impact on trainee personal and skills development. Compelling Perspectives on Counselling: VISTAS, 173-176.
Hughes, J. (2012). Practical aspects of supervision: All you ever wanted to know but were too afraid to ask. In I. Fleming & L. Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives (pp. 184–206). Hove, UK: Routledge.
Hutt, C. H., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983).A phenomenological study of supervisees' positive and negative experiences in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20(1), 118. doi: 10.1037/h0088471
İlhan, T., Rahat, E., & Yöntem, M. K. (2015). Psikolojik danışman adaylarının süpervizyon sürecinde yaşadıkları danışma kaygısına ve süpervizyon eğitimine yönelik deneyimlerinin incelenmesi. Paper presented at the annual National Conference of Guidance and Counseling, Mersin, Turkey.
Inman, A. G. (2006). Supervisor multicultural competence and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(1), 73-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01589.x
Ivey, A. E. & Ivey, M. B. (2003). Intentional interviewing and counseling: Facilitating client development in a multicultural society. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.
Jacobsen, C. H. & Tanggaard, L. (2009). Beginning therapists’ experiences of what constitutes good and bad psychotherapy supervision: With a special focus on individual differences. Nordic Psychology, 61, 59-84. doi: 10.1027/1901-2276.61.4.59
Kağnıcı, Y. (2015, October). Çokkültürlü süpervizyon ve çokkültürlü süpervizyon yeterlikleri. Paper presented at the annual National Conference of Guidance and Counseling, Mersin, Turkey.
Karpenko, V., & Gidycz, C. A. (2012). The supervisory relationship and the process of evaluation: Recommendations for supervisors. The Clinical Supervisor, 31(2), 138-158. doi: 10.1080/07325223.2013.730014
Koç, İ. (2013). Kişilerarası süreci hatırlama tekniğine dayalı süpervizyonun psikolojik danışman adaylarının psikolojik danışma becerilerine, özyeterlik ve kaygı düzeylerine etkisi. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
Korkut Owen, F. & Güneri Yerin, O. (2015). Counseling in Turkey. In T.H. Hohenshil, N. E., Amundson & S. G. Niles (Eds). Counseling around the world. Alexandria, VA: ACA (pp. 293-302).
Kurtyılmaz, Y. (2015). Counselor trainees’ views on their forthcoming experiences in practicum course. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 155–180. doi: 14689/ejer.2015.61.9
Ladany, N. & Lehrman-Waterman, D. E. (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38(3). doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb00567.x
Ladany, N., & Friedlander, M. L. (1995).The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees' experience of role conflict and role ambiguity. Counselor Education and supervision, 34(3), 220-231.doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1995.tb00244.x
Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77(4), 447-455. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02472.x
Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 10.doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.10
Ladany, N., Mori, Y., & Mehr, K. E. (2013).Effective and ineffective supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(1), 28-47. doi: 10.1177/0011000012442648
Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Melincoff, D. S. (2001). Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory working alliance and supervisor self‐disclosure. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40(4), 263-275. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2001.tb01259.x
Lehrman-Waterman, D., & Ladany, N. (2001). Development and validation of the evaluation process within supervision inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(2), 168. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.168
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Que, J. (2009). Relationship dimensions in the professional supervision of psychology graduates: Supervisee perceptions of processes and outcome. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 127-140. doi: 10.1080/01580370902927451
Lochner, B. T. & Melchert, T. P. (1997). Relationship of cognitive style and theoretical orientation to psychology interns’ preferences for supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(2), 256-260. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.44.2.256
Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model. The Counseling Psychologist, 10(1), 3-42. doi: 10.1177/0011000082101002
Magnuson, S., Wilcoxon, S. A., & Norem, K. (2000). A profile of lousy supervision: Experienced counselors' perspectives. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(3), 189-202. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2000.tb01231.x
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Meydan, B. & Denizli, S. (2018). Turkish undergraduate supervisees’ views regarding supervisory relationship. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 74, 1-24. doi: 10.14689/ejer.2018.74.1
Meydan, B. (2010). Psikolojik danışman adaylarının içerik yansıtma ve duygu yansıtma becerilerine ilişkin yeterlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(4), 1-15.
Meydan, B. (2015). Bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulamasında Mikro Beceri Süpervizyon Modeli’nin etkililiğinin incelenmesi. Türk Psikololojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5(43), 55-68.
Min, R. M. (2012). Impact of the supervisory relationship on trainee development. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(18), 168-177.
Nelson, M. L. & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4). doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.384
Nelson, M. L., Barnes, K. L., Evans, A. L., & Triggiano, P. J. (2008).Working with conflict in clinical supervision: Wise supervisors' perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 172. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.172
Nelson, M. L., Gray, L. A., Friedlander, M. L., Ladany, N., & Walker, J. A. (2001). Toward relationship-centered supervision: Reply to Veach (2001) and Ellis (2001). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 407-409. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.407
Olk, M. E. & Friedlander, M. L. (1992).Trainees' experiences of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(3), 389-397. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.39.3.389
Palomo, M., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. J. (2010). Development and validation of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(2), 131-149. doi: 10.1348/014466509X441033
Pamukçu, B. (2011).The investigatıon of counseling self-efficacylevels of counselor trainees.Unpublished master’s thesis, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Patton, M. J. & Kivlighan Jr, D. M. (1997). Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(1), 108-115. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.44.1.108
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
Phelps, D. L. (2013). Supervisee experiences of corrective feedback in clinical supervision: A consensual qualitative research study. Unpublished master’s thesis, Marquette University, USA.
Poyrazlı, Ş., Doğan, S., & Eskin, M. (2013). Counseling and psychotherapy in Turkey: Western theories and culturally inclusive methods. In R. Moodly, U. P. Gielen, & R. Wu (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy in an international context (pp. 404–414). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ramos-Sánchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L. O., Wright, L. K., & Rodolfa, E. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 197-202. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.197
Ronnestad, M. H. & Skovholt. T. M. (2003). The journey of the counselor and therapist: research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30(1), 5-44. doi: 10.1177/089484530303000102
Scaife, J. (2009). Supervision and personal development. In J. Hughes & S. Youngson (Eds.), Personal development and clinical psychology (pp. 89). The British Psychological Society.
Stoltenberg, C. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 59–65. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.28.1.59
Stoltenberg, C. D., McNeill, B., & Delworth, U. (1998). IDM supervision. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Swanson, J. L. & O'Saben, C. L. (1993). Differences in supervisory needs and expectations by trainee experience, cognitive style, and program membership. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71(4), 457-464. doi: j.1556-6676.1993.tb02665.x
Ülker-Tümlü, G., Balkaya-Çetin, A., & Kurtyılmaz, Y. (2015, October). Assessing individual counseling sessions of counselor candidates. Paper presented at the annual National Conference of Guidance and Counseling, Mersin, Turkey.
Vallance, K. (2005). Exploring counsellor perceptions of the impact of counselling supervision on clients. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 5(2), 107-110. doi: 10.1080/17441690500211106
Weaks, D. (2002). Unlocking the secrets of “good supervision”: A phenomenological exploration of experienced counsellors' perceptions of good supervision. Counselling and Psychotheraphy Research, 2(1), 33-39. doi: 10.1080/14733140212331384968
Worthen, V. & McNeill, B. W. (1996). A phenomenological investigation of good supervision events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 25-34.doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.25
Worthington, E. L. & Roehlke, H. J. (1979). Effective supervision as perceived by beginning counselors-in-training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 26(1), 64.doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.26.1.64
Worthington, E. L. (2006). Changes in supervision as counselors and supervisors gain experience: A review. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 18(3), 133-160. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.18.3.189
Yeşilyaprak, B. (2012). The paradigm shift of vocational guidance and career counseling and its implications for Turkey: An evaluation from past to future. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 97–118.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.
Zeren, G. Ş. & Yılmaz, M. S. (2011). Bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulaması dersini alan öğrencilerin süpervizyona bakış açıları: Yeditepe Üniversitesi örneği. Paper presented at the annual National Conference of Guidance and Counseling, İzmir, Turkey.
Published
2018-10-15
How to Cite
Meydan, B. (2018). Facilitative and hindering factors regarding the supervisory relationship based on supervisors’ and undergraduate supervisees’ opinions. Pegem Eğitim Ve Öğretim Dergisi, 9(1), 171-208. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.007