Prediction of students' strategies for doing science homework by parental support and students' goal orientation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.019

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine how parents’ support for their children’s science homework and the goal orientation of students in science homework predict their deep learning and management strategies that students use when doing homework. For this purpose, among quantitative research approaches, correlational method was used in the study. The sample of the study consisted of 328 middle school students enrolling in public schools in Erzurum. As data gathering tools, the Parental Homework Support Scale, Homework Goal Orientation Scale and Homework Strategy use Scale were used. The results of the hierarchical regression analysis revealed that the content- and autonomy-oriented support of the parents were positive predictors of deep learning and management strategies. The mastery and performance goal orientation predicted the management strategy positively, whereas the work-avoidance negatively predicted it. Among the goal orientations, it was seen that only the mastery goal orientation predicted the deep learning strategy and the relationship was in positive direction. The parental homework support and student’s goal orientation in homework explained 61.00% of the variance in the homework management strategy and 53.00% of the variance in the deep learning strategy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J. & Thorndıke, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods, New York: John Willey.
Conroy, D. E. & Elliot, A. J., (2004). Fear of failure and achievement goals in sport: Adressing the issue of the chicken and the egg. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17 (3), 271-285.
Covington, M. V. (1985). Strategic thinking and the fear of failure. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman ve R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (pp. 398–416). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Dupeyrat, C. & Martiné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: a test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43–59.
Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232
Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2X2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
Elliot, A. J. & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613-628.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (3rd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Friedel, J. M., Cortina, K. S., Turner, J. C. & Midgley, C. (2007). Achievement goals, efficacy beliefs and coping strategies in mathematics: The roles of perceived parent and teacher goal emphases. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32 (3), 434-458.
Kahraman, N. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of achievement goals. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
Kahraman, N. & Sungur, S. (2011). The contribution of motivational beliefs to students’ metacognitive strategy use. Education and Science, 36 (160), 3-10.
Küçükahmet, L. (2004). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Nobel Basımevi.
Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social context: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125–141.
McElhaney, K. B. & Allen, J. P. (2001). Autonomy and adolescent social functioning: The moderating effect of risk. Child Development, 72 (1), 220–235.
McKenzie, K., Gow, K. & Schweitzer, R. (2004). Exploring first-year academic achievement through structural equation modelling. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 95–112.
Midgley, C. & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61-75.
Nien, C. & Duda, J., L. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of approach and avoidance achievement goals: A test of gender invariance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9 (3), 352- 372.
Oğuzkan, F. (1985). Orta dereceli okullarda öğretim. Emel Matbaacılık: Ankara.
Olausen, B. S. & Bräten, I. (1999). Students’ use of strategies for self-regulated learning: cross-cultural perspectives. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43, 409–431.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Ramdass, D. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22 (2), 194-218.
Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear model: Applications and data analysis method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Tas, Y., Sungur, S. & Oztekin, C. (2016). Development and validation of science homework scale for middle school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14 (3), 417-444.
Trivette, P. & Anderson, E. (1995). The effects of four components of parental involvement on eight-grade student achievement: structural analysis of nels-88 data. School Psychology Review, 24 (2), 51-59.
Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman ve D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205.
Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L. & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211-238.
Xu, J. (2004). Parent help and homework management in urban and rural secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 106, 1786–1803.
Xu, J. (2005). Purposes for doing homework reported by middle and high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 46-55.
Xu, J. (2008a). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 109 (1), 82-95.
Xu, J. (2008b). Models of secondary school students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45 (4), 1180-1205.
Xu, J. (2010). Predicting homework time management at the secondary school level: A multilevel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 20 (1), 34-39.
Xu, J., Fan, X., Du, J. & He, M. (2017). A study of the validity and reliability of the parental homework support scale. Measurement, 95, 93-98.
Xu, J. & Wu, H. (2013). Self-regulation of homework behavior: homework management at the secondary school level. The Journal of Educational Research, 106 (1), 1-13.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Published

2019-03-25

How to Cite

Kurt, U., & Taş, Y. (2019). Prediction of students’ strategies for doing science homework by parental support and students’ goal orientation. Pegem Eğitim Ve Öğretim Dergisi, 9(2), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.019