Assessment of Learning Outcomes of Children with Special Needs in Vocational Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.02.12Keywords:
learning outcomes; children with special needs, vocational schoolsAbstract
This article presents an assessment analysis of the learning outcomes of students with special needs in vocational schools. The limitations of teachers in using test instruments in learning assessments have an impact on the weak feedback on improving learning programs received by students with special needs. This study used a descriptive study method at vocational schools of SMK Negeri 1 and SMK Karsa Mulya Palangka Raya, Indonesia. The results of the study revealed that teachers in this vocational school in the assessment of learning outcomes of students with special needs have not used the category of children with special needs of light, medium, and severe. The assessment is based only on the minimum standards set by the school. Then, the assessment pattern given by the teacher based on the minimum completion criteria makes the teacher's responsibility less than optimal in evaluating the learning outcomes of students with special needs, which is characterized by the lack of use of test instruments as an objective measuring tool in formative assessment
Downloads
References
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Boston, C. (2002). The Concept of Formative Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 18(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7275/kmcq-dj31
DeMatthews, D., Billingsley, B., McLeskey, J., & Sharma, U. (2020). Principal leadership for students with disabilities in effective inclusive schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2019-0177
Fatimah, A. T. (2018). Pedagogik Matematika Di Sekolah Vokasi. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 5(4). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/wa.v5i4.1553
Hellmich, F., Loper, M. F., & Orel, G. G. €. (2019). The role of primary school teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs for everyday practices in inclusive classrooms – a study on the verification of the ‘Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12476
Inglar, T. (2014). Proficiency Forms and Vocational Pedagogical Principles. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 18(2).
Kožuh, A. (2019). Perspectives on assessment at school. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 70(2), 160–173.
Krathwohl, B. S. B., & Masia, B. . (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain. David McKay Company, Inc.
Maciver, D., Hunter, C., Adamson, A., Grayson, Z., Forsyth, K., & McLeod, I. (2018). Supporting successful inclusive practices for learners with disabilities in high schools: a multisite, mixed method collective case study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(14). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1306586
Messiou, K., & Ainscow, M. (2020). Inclusive Inquiry: Student–teacher dialogue as a means of promoting inclusion in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 46(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3602
Nishina, A., Lewis, J. A., Bellmore, A., & Witkow, M. R. (2019). Ethnic Diversity and Inclusive School Environments. Educational Psychologist, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1633923
Page, A., Charteris, J., Anderson, J., & Boyle, C. (2021). Fostering school connectedness online for students with diverse learning needs: inclusive education in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(1), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1872842
Pratiwi, L. D. (2012). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika Di Sekolah Penyelenggara Pendidikan Inklusif. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 1(1). Retrieved from http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jpk/article/view/5677
Sánchez, P. A., Rodríguez, R. de H., Maldonado, R. M., & Martínez. (2019). Barriers to Student Learning and Participation in an Inclusive School as Perceived by Future Education Professionals. JOURNAL OF NEW APPROACHES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.321
Štemberger, T., & Kiswarday, V. R. (2018). Attitude towards inclusive education: the perspective of Slovenian preschool and primary school teachers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1297573
Stevens, L., & Wurf, G. (2020). Perceptions of inclusive education: A mixed methods investigation of parental attitudes in three Australian primary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1464068
Sukinah. (n.d.). Sistem Penilaian Hasil Belajar Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Dalam Implementasi Pendidikan Setting Inklusi.
Udvari-Solner, A., & Thousand, J. (2018). Effective Organisational Instructional and Curricular Practices in Inclusive Schools and Classrooms. In Towards Inclusive Schools? https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469084
Walker, V. L., Chung, Y.-C., & Bonnet, L. K. (2018). Function-Based Intervention in Inclusive School Settings: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717718350
Wilson, C., Woolfson, L. M., & Durkin, K. (2020). School environment and mastery experience as predictors of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards inclusive teaching. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1455901
Zoks, M. (2017). An example of formative assesment & evaluation at geography in the seventh class. Geografija v Soli Journal, 25(2), 45–47.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.