Computational Thinking Skill For Mathematics and Attitudes Based on Gender: Comparative and Relationship Analysis




Computational, Thinking, Attitude, Mathematics, Gender


Based on previous research, Computational Thinking (CT) Skills and attitudes can be influenced by gender differences. In addition, attitudes also have a correlation and influence on CT Skills. However, research on CT skills, attitudes, and gender for mathematics subjects and the relationship between CT skills for mathematics and attitudes is still limited. So, This research was conducted to fill the gap. Methods of this research uses quantitative descriptive with comparative and correlation design. The participants in this study were students at one of the junior high schools in the city of Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta Special Region Province, Indonesia (N = 92). The research data was obtained by using a mathematical problem solving test to measure CT Skills, and a questionnaire to measure CT attitudes. Data were analyzed using multivariate and simple linear regression. The results obtained several findings, including the CT skills of girl students are better than boy students in solving mathematical problems. There is no difference in CT Attitude between boy and girl students. There is a significant relationship and influence of CT attitudes on CT skills


Download data is not yet available.


Alsancak, D. (2020). Investigating computational thinking skills based on different variables and determining the predictor variables. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 102-114.

Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185.

Anistyasari, Y., Nurlaela, L., & Sumbawati, M. S. (2019). Analysis of computational thinking skill predictors on information technology education students. In International Conference on Education, Science and Technology, 109-114.

Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71-80.

Bishara, S. (2016). Creativity in unique problem-solving in mathematics and its influence on motivation for learning. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1202604.

Boaler, J. (2002). Paying the price for "sugar and spice": shifting the analytical lens in equity research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2/3), 127.

Cahyono, B., Rohman, A. A., & Fauzi, M. (2021). Profile of students’ creative thinking in solving mathematics problems in terms of gender. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012117.

Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American educational research journal, 26(4), 499-531.

Ching, Yu-Hui, Yu-Chang Hsu, and Sally Baldwin. (2018). Developing computational thinking with educational technologies for young learners. TechTrends, 62(6), 563-573.

Cutumisu, M., Adams, C., Glanfield, F., Yuen, C., & Lu, C. (2021). Using Structural Equation Modeling to Examine the Relationship Between Preservice Teachers’ Computational Thinking Attitudes and Skills. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(2), 177-183.

Cutumisu, M., Adams, C., Glanfield, F., Yuen, C., & Lu, C. (2021). Using Structural Equation Modeling to Examine the Relationship Between Preservice Teachers’ Computational Thinking Attitudes and Skills. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(2), 177-183.

Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H., Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., & Tani, S. (2020). What is society 5.0. Society, 5, 1-23.

Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 27(5), 47-50.

Fukuzawa, S., Boyd, C., & Cahn, J. (2017). Student motivation in response to problem-based learning. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 175-188.

Gadanidis, G., Cendros, R., Floyd, L., & Namukasa, I. (2017). Computational thinking in mathematics teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 17(4), 458–477.

Geist, E. A., & King, M. (2008). Different, not better: gender differences in mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(1).

Halpern, D. F. (2004). A cognitive-process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current directions in psychological science, 13(4), 135-139.

Hava, K., & Koyunlu Ünlü, Z. (2021). Investigation of the relationship between middle school students’ computational thinking skills and their STEM career interest and attitudes toward inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(4), 484-495.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & DeSimone, C. (2013). Problem-based learning: An instructional model of collaborative learning. In The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 370-385), Routledge : Newyork.

Hooshyar, D., Malva, L., Yang, Y., Pedaste, M., Wang, M., & Lim, H. (2021). An adaptive educational computer game: Effects on students' knowledge and learning attitude in computational thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106575.

Hou, H. Y., Agrawal, S., & Lee, C. F. (2020). Computational thinking training with technology for non-information undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100720.

Jin, Y., Sun, J., Ma, H., & Wang, X. (2021). The impact of different types of scaffolding in project-based learning on girls' computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. In 2021 Tenth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), 362-366.

Juškevičienė, A., & Dagienė, V. (2018). Computational thinking relationship with digital competence. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 265-284.

Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students' interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & education, 127, 178-189.

Korkmaz, Ö., & Xuemei, B. A. İ. (2019). Adapting computational thinking scale (CTS) for Chinese high school students and their thinking scale skills level. Participatory Educational Research, 6(1), 10-26.

Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2020). Students’ attitudes towards robotics and STEM: Differences based on gender and robotics experience. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 23, 100167.

LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92.

Lei, H., Chiu, M. M., Li, F., Wang, X., & Geng, Y. J. (2020). Computational thinking and academic achievement: A meta-analysis among students. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105439.

Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (2021). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Aptitude, learning, and instruction (pp. 223-254), Routledge:London.

Maxwell, S. E., Delaney, H. D., & Kelley, K. (2017). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Routledge.

Moore, T. J., Brophy, S. P., Tank, K. M., Lopez, R. D., Johnston, A. C., Hynes, M. M., & Gajdzik, E. (2020). Multiple representations in computational thinking tasks: a clinical study of second-grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 19-34.

Murnieks, C. Y., Klotz, A. C., & Shepherd, D. A. (2020). Entrepreneurial motivation: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(2), 115-143.

Myers, B. E., & Dyer, J. E. (2006). The influence of student learning style on critical thinking skill. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(1), 43.

Nuraisa, D., Saleh, H., & Raharjo, S. (2021). Profile Of Students’computational Thinking Based On Self-Regulated Learning In Completing Bebras Tasks. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 40-50.

Ohno, A., Yamasaki, T., & Tokiwa, K. I. (2019). Development Of Programming Education Material For Elementary Students To Learn Computational Thinking. In INTED2019 Proceedings, 3009-3014.

Park, K. E., & Lee, S. G. (2015). Improving computational thinking abilities through the teaching of mathematics with Sage. Communications of Mathematical Education, 29(1), 19-33.

Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Effects of gender and thinking style on student's creative thinking ability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5135-5139.

Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Larimore, R. A. (2020). Teacher implementation profiles for integrating computational thinking into elementary mathematics and science instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3161-3188.

Rich, P. J., Mason, S. L., & O'Leary, J. (2021). Measuring the effect of continuous professional development on elementary teachers’ self-efficacy to teach coding and computational thinking. Computers & Education, 168, 104196.

Rodríguez del Rey, Y. A., Cawanga Cambinda, I. N., Deco, C., Bender, C., Avello‐Martínez, R., & Villalba‐Condori, K. O. (2021). Developing computational thinking with a module of solved problems. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 506-516.

Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in human behavior, 72, 678-691.

Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2019). Pervasive Learning and Technology Usage for Creativity Development in Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(1).

Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2022). Programming attitudes predict computational thinking: Analysis of differences in gender and programming experience. Computers & Education, 181, 104457.

Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2021). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 346-358.

Supiarmo, M. G., Hadi, H. S., & Tarmuzi, T. (2022). Student’s Computational Thinking Process in Solving PISA Questions in Terms of Problem Solving Abilities. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 5(1), 01-11.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48(6), 1273-1296.

Tedre, M., & Denning, P. J. (2016, November). The long quest for computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling international conference on computing education research, 120-129.

Trevelyan, R. (2011). Self-efficacy and effort in new venture development. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 2-16.

Ummah, S. K., In'am, A., & Azmi, R. D. (2019). Creating Manipulatives: Improving Students' Creativity through Project-Based Learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 93-102.

Wardani, R., Hwang, W. Y., Zakaria, M., Priyanto, P., Luthfi, M. I., Rochmah, I. N., ... & Putra, M. T. M. (2021). An Authentic Learning Approach to Assist the Computational Thinking in Mathematics Learning for Elementary School. Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education), 6(2), 139-148.

Wei, X., Lin, L., Meng, N., Tan, W., & Kong, S. C. (2021). The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 160, 104023.

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147.

Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, J., & McLean, T. (2017). Computational thinking in teacher education. In Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking. 205-220.

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1-16.

Yunus, A. S., & Ali, W. Z. W. (2009). Motivation in the Learning of Mathematics. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 93-101.

Zakaria, N. I., & Iksan, Z. H. (2020). Computational Thinking among High School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11A), 9-16.

Zhong, B., Wang, Q., Chen, J., & Li, Y. (2016). An exploration of three-dimensional integrated assessment for computational thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(4), 562-590.




How to Cite

Richardo, R. R., Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum, & Ariyadi Wijaya. (2023). Computational Thinking Skill For Mathematics and Attitudes Based on Gender: Comparative and Relationship Analysis. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 345–353.