Evaluation Of Blended Learning-Based Utilization Using CSE-UCLA Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.02.16Keywords:
blended learning, evaluation, cse-uclaAbstract
The use of blended learning-based learning is identified to have a major influence on the achievement of learning objectives in the classroom. The application of blended learning-based learning can facilitate the time and types of students' diverse learning so that students can learn according to their needs. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of using Blended Learning-based learning at MTs Ittaqollah Ambon in terms of several evaluation components, namely system assessment, program planning, program implementation, program improvement, and program certification. The method used in this study is an evaluative study using the CSE-UCLA (Center for the Study of the Evaluation University of California in Los Angeles) evaluation model. The subjects in this study consisted of principals, teachers, students, and the Blended Learning management team. The results showed that the average level of effectiveness of the components of the assessment system was 86.6% (good category), the average level of effectiveness of the planning program components was 84.5% (good category), the average effectiveness level of program implementation components was 89 .3% (good category), the average level of effectiveness of improvement program components is 85.5% (good category), the average effectiveness level of certification program components is 85.9% (good category). The results of this study can provide recommendations for improvement or refinement of the use of blended learning held in schools so that learning objectives can be achieved optimally.
Downloads
References
Akgundus, D & Akinoglu,, O. (2016). The Effect of Blended Learning and Social Media-Supported Learning on the Students’ Attitude and Self-Directed Learning Skills in Science Education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 106-115.
Alammary, A., Carbone, A., & Sheard, J. (2015). Identifying criteria that should be considered when deciding the proportion of online to face-to-face components of a blended course. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 72-80.
Ariawan, I.P.W., Sanjaya, D.B., & Divayana, D.G.H. 2016. “An Evaluation of the Implementation of Practice Teaching Program for Prospective Teachers at Ganesha University of Education Based on CIPP-Forward Chaining”. International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence, 5(2), 1-5.
Baytak, A., Tarman, B., & Ayas, C. (2011). Experiencing technology integration in education: children’s perceptions. International Electronik Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 139-151.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of Blended Learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Cobena, D. Y., & Surjono, H. D. (2022). Implementation of Flipped Classroom Model in Vocational High School: A Systematic Literature Review. JTP -Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i1.25185
Cullinan, D., Barnett, E. A., Ratledge, A., Welbeck, R., Belfield, C., & Lopez-Salazar, A. (2018). Toward better college course placement: A guide to launching a multiple measures assessment system. MRDC: Community Collega Research Center, Teachers Collega, Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8892PK8
Divayana, D. G. H., & Sugiharni, G. A. D. (2016). Evaluasi program sertifikasi komputer pada universitas teknologi indonesia menggunakan model CSE-UCLA. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(2), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i2.8586
Dudin, M. N & Shishalova, Y. S. (2019). Development of effective education and training system in the context of the transition to international accreditation. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(1), 118-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2019.1.118
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended Learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International journal of educational technology in Higher education, 15(1), 1-16.
Eka, C., Santoso, N. P. L., & Amelia, S. (2021). Software Editing Training for Students at Raharja University. ADI Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy, 1(2), 60-65.
Gonzalez, G.M., & Birchm M.A. (20180. Evaluating the instructional efficacy of computer-mediated interactive multimedia: comparing three elementary statistics tutorial modules. Educ. Comput. Res, 22(4), 411-436
Hartanto, W. (2016). Penggunaan Blended Learning sebagai media pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 10(1), 1–15.
Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021
Hyderali, R. (2017). An insight into the advantages and disadvantages of Blended Learning. Contemporary Research in India, 7(2), 317–320.
Juandi, D & Priatna, N. (2018). Discovery learning model with geogebra assisted for improvement mathematical visual thinking ability. J. Phys. Conf, 1013(1)
Karagöl, İ., & Esen, E. (2019). The effect of flipped learning approach on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(3), pp. 708-727. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018046755
Keser, H., Uzunboylu, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2012). The trends in technology supported collaborative learning studies in 21stcentury. World Journal on Educational Technology, 3(2), 103-119.
Kurt, S. (2010). Technology use in elementary education in Turkey: A case study. New Horizons in Education, 58(1), 65-76
Kusuma, A. (2011). Blended Learning Dalam Pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan, 14(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2011v14n1a3
Lalima, L., & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended Learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5,129-136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
Lin, Y. W. (2017). The effect of Blended Learning in mathematics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a
Marco, F. A., Penichet, V. M. R., & Lázaro, J. A. G. (2013). Drawer: An innovative teaching method for Blended Learning. In S. F. Tang, & L. Logonnathan (Eds.), Taylor’s 7thteaching and learning conference proceedings,727-734, Singapore: Springer.
Nurhaeni, T., Lutfiani, N., Singh, A., Febriani, W., & Hardini, M. (2021). The Value of Technological Developments Based on An Islamic Perspective. International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management, 1(1), 1-13.
Nurjanah., Latif, B., Yuliardi, R & Tamur, M. (2020). Computer-assisted learning using the Cabri 3D for improving spatial ability and self- regulated learning. Heliyon, 6 (11), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05536
Orlowski, M. (2021). External wine education and certification for restaurant service staff: a mixed-methods evaluation of training effectiveness. International Hospitality Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-03-2021-0023
Phung, K., & Ogunshile, E. (2020). An algorithm for implementing a minimal stream X-Machine model to test the correctness of a system. International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONISOFT50191.2020.00023
Prasetya, B., Muchtar, H., & Syahrial, Z. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Statistik. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan (JTP), 20(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.24114/jtp.v11i2.12591
Purwandani, I. (2017). Analisa Tingkat Kesiapan Blended Learning (Blended Learning Readiness) Studi Kasus: AMIK Bina Sarana Informatika Jakarta. Jurnal Bianglala Informatika, 5(2), 102–107.
Sanuaka, A. A., Ariawan, K. U., & Sutaya, W. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Electronic Book (E-Book) Interaktif Multimedia Dalam Mata Pelajaran Teknik Animasi 3D Dan Teknik Animasi 2D Di Jurusan Multimedia SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro Undiksha, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpte.v6i2.20234
Setiawan, A. A., Muhtadi, A., & Hukom, J. (2022). Blended Learning and student mathematics ability in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15249a
Sung, Y.T., Chang, K.E & Liu, T.C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis. Comput. Educ, 94, 252-275
Sutanta, E. (2015). Konsep dan Implementasi Blended Learning (Studi Kasus Pengembangan ELearning di SMA N 1 Sentolo Yogyakarta). Jurnal DASI: STMIK AMIKOM Yogyakarta, 10(23), 1-15.
Syarif, I. (2012). Pengaruh model Blended Learning terhadap motivasi dan prestasi belajar siswa SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 2(2), 234–249. Retrieved from
Tuomainen, S. (2016). A blended learning approach to academic writing and presentation skills. International Journal on Language, Literature and Culture in Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/llce-2016-0009.
Weiner, S., Schwartz, A., Altman, L., Ball, S., Bartle, B., Binns-Calvey., Chan, C., Falck-Ytter., Frenchman, M., Gee, B., Jackson, J. L., Jordan, N., Kass, B., Kelly, B., Safdar, N., Scholcoff, C., Sharma, G., Weaver, F., & Wopat, M. (2020). Evaluation of a patient-collected audio audit and feedback quality improvement program on clinician attention to patient life context and health care costs in the veterans affairs health care system. JAMA network open, 3(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644
Yustanti, I., & Novita, D. (2019). Pemanfaatan Blended Learning Bagi Para Pendidik Di Era Digital 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 338–346.
Zhan, W. (2020). WEAVEonline: An Assessment and Planning Management System for Improving Student Learning. Paper presented at 2017 Gulf Southwest Section Conference, Richardson, TX, 33811.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
