Low Rectal Carcinoma: Balancing Oncological Efficacy and Quality of Life in Surgical Decision Making

Authors

  • Rizig Hamdi Mustafa Heteta, Wael El Sayed Lotfy Mokhtar, Salah Mansour Abdel Aal, Ahmed Raafat Abd El Fatah

Keywords:

Low Rectal Carcinoma, Oncological Efficacy, Quality of Life

Abstract

Background: Low rectal carcinoma remains a formidable surgical and oncological challenge due to its anatomical proximity to the anal sphincter, its impact on bowel function, and the complex interplay between curative resection and postoperative quality of life. Over recent decades, significant advancements have expanded the range of surgical options,from traditional abdominoperineal resection with permanent colostomy to sphincter-preserving procedures and innovative reconstructive techniques such as continent perineal colostomy. However, the optimal approach must not only ensure oncological efficacy but also prioritize functional outcomes and patient well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pachler J, Wille-Jørgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD004323.

Sun V, Grant M, Wendel CS, et al. Dietary adjustment and bowel symptoms in long-term colorectal cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(3):373-382.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Rizig Hamdi Mustafa Heteta, Wael El Sayed Lotfy Mokhtar, Salah Mansour Abdel Aal, Ahmed Raafat Abd El Fatah. (2024). Low Rectal Carcinoma: Balancing Oncological Efficacy and Quality of Life in Surgical Decision Making. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(3), 554–562. Retrieved from https://pegegog.net/index.php/pegegog/article/view/4182

Issue

Section

Article