PLT (Program of Training Lecturer) research asssistants' opinions about domestic and outland language training

Authors

  • Ceylan Gündeğer Hacettepe University
  • Sümeyra Soysal
  • Esed Yağcı Hacettepe University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14527/C2S4M5

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine PLT (Program of Training Lecturer) research assistans' views about domestic and outland language training. Accordinglythe opinions were obtained from 10 PLT research assistants, who had domestic language training, and 11 PLT research assistants, who had outland language training, with 5 open-ended questions semi-structured interview formby having face to face interview. In data analysis the content analysis was used. The results of the study revealed that PTL research assistants had expectations of general and academic English from domestic language education. Most of research assistants noted that domestic language education didn't meet those expectations. The most important problems faced by research assistants were housing and exam-business anxiety in language education. Also research assistants stated that they had not found an effective language education. Finally PTL research assistants have made some suggestions both CHE (the Council of Higher Education) and other PTL research assistants. On the other hand it is concluded that PTL research assistants', who had outland language training, most important expectations are to improve their ability in speaking, writing an article and giving a presentation. In addition the research assistants had some problems about housing, teachers'qualifications and the Turkish students in a class and had not solved this problems. It is seen that they don't find the training program effective and further it was not satisfy their expectitons. Accordingly it is seen that, the most important things are prefering the countries, have native speakers like USA, UK, Canada, reducing the Turkish student in a class and being in the academic environment like universities instead of courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batumlu, D. Z. ve Erden, M. (2007). The relationship between foreign language anxiety and english achievement of yıldız technical unıversity school of foreign language spreparatory students. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(1), 24-38.
DPT (2006). Bilgi toplumu stratejisi sosyal dönüşüm mevcut durum tespiti nihai rapor. http://www.bilgitoplumu.gov.tr/btstrateji/BTS%20-%20MDT%20-%20Sosyal%20Donusum%20-%20Nihai.pdf adresinden 18.05.2012 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Ekinci, C. E. (2009). Türkiye'de yükseköğretimde öğrenci harcama ve maliyetleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(154), 119-133.
Ekinci, C. E. (2011). Bazı sosyoekonomik etmenlerin Türkiye'de yükseköğretime katılım üzerindeki etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(160), 281 ' 297.
Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., Moorcroft, R., ve Evers, F. T. (1987). Second languageattrition: the role of motivationanduse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 29-47.
Gregersen, T. S. (2003). To err is human: a reminder to teachers of language anxiousstudents. Foreign Language Annals, 36(1), 25-32.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B. ve Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal,70(2), 125-132.
Işık, A. (2008). Yabancı dil eğitimimizdeki yanlışlar nereden kaynaklanıyor? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies,4(2),15-26
Karasar, N. (1994). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Ankara: 3A Araştırma Eğitim Danışmanlık.
Korkut, H. (2002). Sorgulanan yükseköğretim. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. (2nd Edition). Calif. : SAGE Publications.
MYBK (2010). 2010 Yılı Merkezi Yönetim Bütçe Kanunu. http://www.bumko.gov.tr/TR/Genel/BelgeGoster.aspx?F6E10F8892433CFF7A2395174CFB32E11DFC3D08A3FF4BB5 adresinden 09.06.2012 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Dalkılıç, N. (2001). An investigation into the role of anxiety in second language learning. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
ÖYP (2010). Öğretim Üyesi Yetiştirme Esas ve Usuller. https://basin.yok.gov.tr/?page=duyurular& v=read&i=103 adresinden 09.06.2012 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/14225744.asp
http://www.akademikpersonel.org/threads/14901-T%C3%BCm-%C3%96YP-Y%C3%B6netmelikler

Downloads

Published

2012-12-01

How to Cite

Gündeğer, C., Soysal, S., & Yağcı, E. (2012). PLT (Program of Training Lecturer) research asssistants’ opinions about domestic and outland language training. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 2(4), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.14527/C2S4M5