The importance and meaningfulness of visuals: The situation for university students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.05

Keywords:

Visual literacy, higher education, tertiary students, visual preferences

Abstract

The intense use of visual communication tools in today’s knowledge and communication era does not mean that visual messages are correctly perceived and communication is appropriately structured. Similarly, it is just an assumption that people from younger generations, who are believed to have high levels of visual literacy, properly perceive the visuals they are exposed to. This study aims to determine whether there is a correlation between university students’ visual literacy levels and their skills for comprehending, interpreting, and evaluating visuals as well as between their visual literacy perceptions of themselves and their inclination to visuals and/or text on a web page they visit. More specifically, the study examines whether university students who perceive themselves as individuals with high levels of visual literacy are really equipped with these skills and whether they incline to visuals first or not when they access a web page. The study, which uses a relational survey method, was conducted with 478 university students. The findings of the study showed that university students cannot always correctly interpret visuals although they perceive themselves as visually literate individuals. The study also revealed that university students with high levels of visual. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

M. Betül Yılmaz, Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Education

M. Betül Yılmaz earned her B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in Computer Science Engineering and received her Ph.D. in Educational Programs and Instruction from Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. She works as an associate professor in Computer Education and Instructional Technologies Department at the same university and teaches B.Sc. and M.Sc. courses in learning and instruction, scientific research methods, and visual literacy. Her research interests are instructional technology, blended learning, material development, and visual literacy. She was in projects related to integrating technology into education and teacher education. She has presented at national and international conferences and published scholarly articles.

References

Arslan, R., & Nalinci, G. Z. (2014). Development of visual literacy levels scale in higher education. Turkish online journal of educational technology, 13(2), 61-70.

Avgerinou, M. D. (2007). Towards a visual literacy index. Journal of Visual Literacy, 27(1), 29-46. Doi: 10.1080/23796529.2007.11674644

Avgerinou, M. D., & Pettersson, R. (2011). Toward a cohesive theory of visual literacy. Journal of visual literacy, 30(2), 1-19. Doi: 10.1080/23796529.2011.11674687

Avgerinou, M., & Ericson, J. (1997). A review of the concept of visual literacy. British journal of educational technology, 28(4), 280-291.

Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 225, 556 - 559. Doi:10.1126/science.1736359

Bamford, A. (2003). The visual literacy white paper. Uxbridge: Adobe. https://www.aperture.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/visual-literacy-wp.pdf

Bol, N., van Weert, J. C., Loos, E. F., Bergstrom, J. C. R., Bolle, S., & Smets, E. M. (2016). How are online health messages processed? Using eye tracking to predict recall of information in younger and older adults. Journal of health communication, 21(4), 387-396. Doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1080327

Braden, R. A. (1996). Visual literacy. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 3(5), 491-520.

Brill, J. M., Kim, D., & Branch, R. M. (2007). Visual literacy defined - the results of a delphi study: Can IVLA (operationally) define visual literacy? Journal of visual literacy, 27(1), 47-60. Doi: 10.1080/23796529.2007.11674645

Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the millennial learner. Journal of visual literacy, 30(1), 19-47. Doi: 10.1080/23796529.2011.11674683

Bulut, B., Ulu, H., & Kan, A. (2015). Multimodal literacy scale: a study of validity and reliability. Eurasian journal of educational research, 61, 45-60. Doi: 10.14689/ejer.2015.61.3

Çelik, G., & Çekiç, O. (2014). Pre-service Turkish language arts teachers’ views on their visual literacy skills. Journal of theory and practice in education, 10(4), 840-862.

Çimen, E. E., & Aygüner, E. (2018). An analysis of eight grade students’ self-efficacy perception of visual mathematics literacy and their actual performance. İlköğretim online, 17(2), 675-696. Doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2018.419026

Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2011). Graphics for Learning: Proven Guidelines for Planning, Designing, and Evaluating Visuals In Training Materials. San Fransisco: Pfeiffer.

Debes, J. L. (1969). The Loom of Visual Literacy: An Overview. Audiovisual instruction, 14(8)25-27.

Doğru, A. G. (2014). The effect of visual arts course on the development of visual literacy skills of high school students. Akdeniz sanat, 11(21), 45-63.

Farrell, T. A. (2015). Visual literacy (VL) in teacher preparation: Measurement to direction. Journal of Visual Literacy, 34(1), 89-104. Doi: 10.1080/23796529.2015.11674724

Felten, P. (2008). Visual literacy. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 40(6), 60-64. Doi: 10.3200/CHNG.40.6.60-64

Harrell, M. C., & Bradley, M. A. (2009). Data collection methods. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Santa Monica: Rand National Defense Research Institute.

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1989). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. Macmillan.

İpek, İ. (2003). Bilgisayarlar, görsel tasarim ve görsel öğrenme stratejileri [Computers, Visual Design and Visual Learning Strategies]. Turkish online journal of educational technology, 2(3), 68-76.

İşler, A. Ş. (2002). Günümüzde görsel okuryazarlık ve görsel okuryazarlık eğitimi [Visual literacy and visual literacy education today]. Journal of Uludag university faculty of education, 15(1), 153-161.

Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). SPSS Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri [SPSS applied multivariate statistics techniques]. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.

Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler [Scientific research method: concepts, principles, techniques]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Katırancı, M. (2014). Inspection of visual perception levels of Gazi University students. International journal of Turkish education science, 2014(3), 1-17.

Kiper, A., Arslan, S., Kıyıcı, M., & Akgün, Ö. E. (2012). Visual literacy scale: the study of validity and reliability. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 2(2), 73-83.

Kocaarslan, M., & Çeliktürk, Z. (2013). Determination of visual literacy competencies of the students of education faculty. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 2(2), 344-362. Doi: 10.14686/201321994

Matusiak, K. K., Heinbach, C., Harper, A., & Bovee, M. (2019). Visual literacy in practice: Use of images in students’ academic work. College & Research Libraries, 80(1), 123.

Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and instruction, 13(2), 125-139. Doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 41, 31-48.

Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of dual coding hypothesis. Journal of educational psychology. 83(4), 484-490.

Mert, E. L. (2017). Visual literacy proficiency of 6th and 8th grade students. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 5(1), 255-266. Doi: 10.18298/ijlet.1702

Mintzer, M. Z., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1999). The picture superiority effect: Support for the distinctiveness model. The American Journal of Psychology, 112(1), 113.

Özsevgeç, T., Akbulut, H., & Özsevgeç, L. C. (2010). Determination of visual literacy of preservice teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(3), 29-41.

Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Pallant, J. (2007). A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows version 15. New York: McGraw Hill.

Pettersson, R. (1993). Visual information. Educational technology. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83(2), 157.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2. On the horizon, 9(6), 2-6.

Şahin, Ç., & Kıran, I. (2009). Evaluation of the visual literacy levels of prospective teachers according to their perceptions. Dumlupınar University, Journal of Social Sciences, 23, 77-90.

Sanalan, V. A., Sülün, A., & Çoban, T. A. (2007). Visual literacy. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 9(2), 33-47.

Schueler, A., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2012). Verbal descriptions of spatial information can interfere with picture processing. Memory, 20(7), 682-699. Doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.693935

Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2012). Instructional technology and media for learning. Boston: Pearson.

Stokes, S. (2002). Visual literacy in teaching and learning: A literature perspective. Electronic Journal for the Integration of technology in Education, 1(1), 10-19.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296. Doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205

Taşpınar, Ş. E. (2017). Determination of visual literacy levels of visual art teacher candidates. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 19(2), 321-334. Doi: 10.17556/erziefd.298455

Turan, İ., & Aslan, H. (2015). Teacher Candidates’ Analysis Levels of Historical Images. Turkish History Education Journal, 4(2), 87-112.

Yeh, H. T., & Cheng, Y. C. (2010). The influence of the instruction of visual design principles on improving pre-service teachers’ visual literacy. Computers & Education, 54(1), 244-252. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.008

Yeh, H. T., & Lohr, L. (2010). Towards evidence of visual literacy: assessing pre-service teachers’ perceptions of instructional visuals. Journal of Visual Literacy, 29(2), 183-197. Doi: 10.1080/23796529.2010.11674680

Yılmaz M. B. (2017). Visual literacy in the context of educational technologies (in Educational Technology Readings ed. H.F. Odabaşı, B. Akkoyunlu, A. İşman), 165-182. Sakarya: PEGEM.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-02

How to Cite

Ekerim, M. G., & Yılmaz, M. B. (2022). The importance and meaningfulness of visuals: The situation for university students. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.05