Thematic learning system as the most effective method to activate students: A systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.30Keywords:
Thematic Learning System; education; students; systematic literature reviewAbstract
Learning is a part of student life, but not all students enjoy learning. Long texts and uninteresting content make students lose interest. We suggest changing the conventional learning method to a new way by using the thematic learning system as a learning tool to overcome this problem. Several kinds of literature have used learning system technology to help students learn new concepts. By combining digital and physical environments, learning activities can be more enjoyable. This article wants to evaluate the effectiveness and results of using the learning system for educational purposes by conducting a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The relationship between conventional learning and thematic learning systems is also considered. Based on our research, we can conclude that using a thematic learning system as a learning tool helps students learn better and be active in thematic subjects. Learning method by combining Google meeting features, learning materials and learning evaluations. Therefore, the thematic learning system can be used to concretely study the structure of abstract concepts. In addition, students find the thematic learning system interesting, which motivates them to learn more. Students can also easily remember information because the experience is more interesting. In general, thematic learning systems are more effective than learning media. Because students can more easily understand the material reproduced in learning and practice, further research and development will make thematic learning systems a more promising learning tool in the future.
Downloads
References
Abdulrahaman, M. D., N. Faruk, A. A. Oloyede, N. T. Surajudeen-Bakinde, L. A. Olawoyin, O. V. Mejabi, Y. O. Imam-Fulani, A. O. Fahm, and A. L. Azeez. 2020. “Multimedia Tools in the Teaching and Learning Processes: A Systematic Review.” Heliyon 6(11):e05312. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312.
Ain, Nurul. 2017. “Holistic Thematic Learning in the Elementary School: Is It Thematic and Holistic?” 158(Ictte):919–28. doi: 10.2991/ictte-17.2017.99.
Alfina, Ommi. 2020. “Penerapan Lms-Google Classroom Dalam Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemi Covid-19.” Majalah Ilmiah METHODA 10(1):38–46. doi: 10.46880/methoda.v10i1.537.
Amin, Victor Luna, and Margaret Chan Kit Yok. 2015. “Thematic Interpretation Approach in Environmental Adult Education.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 167:261–66. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.672.
Aremua, A. Y., A. Shahzada, T. Elhachemib, and ... 2021. “The Impacts of Integrated E-Learning System toward the Challenges Facing Education Sector during and Post Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journal of E … 18(1):34–44.
Arvanitis, Theodoros N., Argeroula Petrou, James F. Knight, Stavros Savas, Sofoklis Sotiriou, Michael Gargalakos, and Elpida Gialouri. 2009. “Human Factors and Qualitative Pedagogical Evaluation of a Mobile Augmented Reality System for Science Education Used by Learners with Physical Disabilities.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. doi: 10.1007/s00779-007-0187-7.
Asrial, Asrial, Syahrial Syahrial, Dwi Agus Kurniawan, May Subandiyo, and Nur Amalina. 2019. “Exploring Obstacles in Language Learning among Prospective Primary School Teacher.” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 8(2):249–54. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i2.16700.
Azimjanova, M. T. 2022. “Distance Learning System as a Means of Information and Communication Technologies in the Educational Process.” European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education ( EJINE ) 2(6):85–87.
Bai, Honghong, Hanna Mulder, Mirjam Moerbeek, Evelyn H. Kroesbergen, and Paul P. M. Leseman. 2021. “Divergent Thinking in Four-Year-Old Children: An Analysis of Thinking Processes in Performing the Alternative Uses Task.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 40(February 2020):100814. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100814.
Cheng, Shu Chen, Gwo Jen Hwang, and Chih Hung Chen. 2019. “From Reflective Observation to Active Learning: A Mobile Experiential Learning Approach for Environmental Science Education.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50(5):2251–70. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12845.
Fajar, Ahmad Nurul, Aldian Nurcahyo, and Septi Redisa Sriratnasari. 2018. “SOA System Architecture for Interconected Modern Higher Education in Indonesia.” Procedia Computer Science 135:354–60. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.184.
Fajaryati, Nuryake, Nurkhamid, Ponco Wali Pranoto, Muslikhin, and Athika Dwi W. 2016. E-Module Development for the Subject of Measuring Instruments and Measurement in Electronics Engineering Education. Vol. 23.
Forcina, Antonio, and Domenico Falcone. 2021. “The Role of Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies for Safety Management: A Systematic Literature Review.” Procedia Computer Science 180(2019):436–45. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.260.
Ghunu, Novtryananda M. S. 2022. “The Challenges of Remote Area Elementary Schools in Thematic Curriculum Implementation.” International Journal of Instruction 15(2):19–36. doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.1522a.
Hallberg, Susanne, Laura Hirsto, and Jani Kaasinen. 2020. “Experiences and Outcomes of Craft Skill Learning with a 360° Virtual Learning Environment and a Head-Mounted Display.” Heliyon 6(8):e04705. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04705.
Hanafi, Yusuf, Ahmad Taufiq, Muhammad Saefi, M. Alifudin Ikhsan, Tsania Nur Diyana, Titis Thoriquttyas, and Faris Khoirul Anam. 2021. “The New Identity of Indonesian Islamic Boarding Schools in the ‘New Normal’: The Education Leadership Response to COVID-19.” Heliyon 7(3). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06549.
Hasyim Asy’ari,1 Zahruddin, 2 Muhammad Rifadho Liwaul Islam3. 2020. “2 3 123.” Islamic Manajemen 3(2):40–46.
Hu, Bin, Sohail M. Noman, Muhammad Irshad, Muhammad Awais, Xilang Tang, Umair Farooq, and Chen Song. 2021. “A Pilot Study of Global ICT Strategy Applications in Sustainable Continuing Education.” Procedia Computer Science 183:849–55. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.009.
Jaya, Panchami, Vinod Kumar Nathan, and Parvathi Ammini. 2019. “Characterization of Marine Bacterial Carbonic Anhydrase and Their CO2 Sequestration Abilities Based on a Soil Microcosm.” Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology 49(9):891–99. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2019.1633669.
Kabudi, Tumaini, Ilias Pappas, and Dag Håkon Olsen. 2021. “AI-Enabled Adaptive Learning Systems: A Systematic Mapping of the Literature.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2(December 2020):100017. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017.
Kahan, David, Thomas L. McKenzie, and Ashna Khatri. 2019. “U.S. Charter Schools Neglect Promoting Physical Activity: Content Analysis of Nationally Representative Elementary Charter School Websites.” Preventive Medicine Reports 14(January):100815. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.01.019.
Kalgotra, Pankush, Ashish Gupta, and Ramesh Sharda. 2021. “Pandemic Information Support Lifecycle: Evidence from the Evolution of Mobile Apps during COVID-19.” Journal of Business Research 134(October 2020):540–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.002.
Khalid, Mohd Sazali, Maizam Alias, Wahid Razally, Sulaiman Yamin, and Tutut Herawan. 2010. “The Effect of Using an Interactive Multimedia Courseware within a Collaborative Learning Environment on the Learning of Pre-Algebra Concepts among Pre-University Engineering Students.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 8(5):571–79. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.079.
Lazăr, Adriana. 2015. “Pre-Primary Educators and the Use of Digital Resources to Raise Early Foreign Language Awareness.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180(November 2014):841–46. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.221.
Lebeaux, David, Eve Jablon, Cécile Flahault, Fanny Lanternier, Jean-Paul Viard, Barbara Pacé, Jean-Luc Mainardi, and Cédric Lemogne. 2021. “Introducing an Open-Source Course Management System (Moodle) for Blended Learning on Infectious Diseases and Microbiology: A Pre-Post Observational Study.” Infectious Diseases Now 14(xxxx). doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2020.11.002.
Lijanporn, Sasitorn, and Jintavee Khlaisang. 2015. “The Development of an Activity-Based Learning Model Using Educational Mobile Application to Enhance Discipline of Elementary School Students.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174:1707–12. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.825.
MacKenzie, Alison, Christine Bower, and Mohammed Owaineh. 2020. “Gratitude versus Children’s Rights: An Exploration Mothers’ Attitudes towards Disability and Inclusive Education in Palestine.” International Journal of Educational Research Open 1(April):100001. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100001.
Mangen, A., T. Hoel, M. Jernes, and T. Moser. 2019. “Shared, Dialogue-Based Reading with Books vs Tablets in Early Childhood Education and Care: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Intervention Study.” International Journal of Educational Research 97(June):88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.07.002.
Mengistie, Tilahun Adamu. 2021. “Research in Globalization Higher Education Students ’ Learning in COVID-19 Pandemic Period : The Ethiopian Context.” 3.
Nae, Niculina. 2020. “Online Learning During the Pandemic : Where Does Japan Stand ?” Euromentor Journal XI(2):7–24.
Nikitas, Alexandros, Judith Y. T. Wang, and Cathy Knamiller. 2019. “Exploring Parental Perceptions about School Travel and Walking School Buses: A Thematic Analysis Approach.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 124(May):468–87. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.011.
Saini, Dinesh Kumar, and Mohammed Rashid Salim Al-Mamri. 2019. “Investigation of Technological Tools Used in Education System in Oman.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 1(1):100003. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2019.100003.
Salahli, M. A., E. Yildirim, T. Gasimzadeh, F. Alasgarova, and A. Guliyev. 2017. “One Mobile Application for the Development of Programming Skills of Secondary School Students.” Procedia Computer Science 120:502–8. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.271.
Saputra, Dudu Suhandi, Devi Afriyuni Yonanda, and Yuyu Yuliati. 2020. “The Development of Android-Based Mobile Learning in Learning Sundanese Script for Elementary School Students.” 397(Icliqe 2019):688–92. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200129.086.
Saundarajan, Kartigeyan, Sharifah Osman, Mohd Fadzil Daud, Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohamad Rasidi Pairan, and Jeya Amantha Kumar. 2020. “Learning Algebra Using Augmented Reality.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 15(16):123–33. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i16.10540.
Sirait, Magdalena, Khairil Ansari, and Naeklan Simbolon. 2019. “Development of Thematic Learning Materials Based on Scientific Approach on Indahnya Alam Negeriku Subtema in 4th Grade of Public Elementary School 094151 Sipanganbolon.” Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal 2(3):333–60. doi: 10.33258/birle.v2i3.375.
Stevenson, Michael Eric, and John Gordon Hedberg. 2017. “Mobilizing Learning: A Thematic Review of Apps in K-12 and Higher Education.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education 14(2):126–37. doi: 10.1108/ITSE-02-2017-0017.
Syarifah, Mufarrahatus, and Hany Handayani. 2019. “Elementary School Teachers’ Conception of E-Learning and Blended Learning.” Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education (Jtlee) 2(1):29. doi: 10.33578/jtlee.v2i1.6702.
Taufikin, N. Zulfa, A. Falah, R. Wijayanti, Manijo, M. E. Mahmud, N. Fadhilah, Zamroni, A. Zaiyadi, and H. Nabawiyah. 2021. “Effect of E-Learning and Educational Information Systems on the Learning Interest of Islamic Elementary School Children.” Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology 25(2):4343–52.
Trimurtini, Liftiah, and Farid Ahmadi. 2019. “The Development of Android-Based Mobile Learning Media (MLM) for Elementary School Students of Kendal Indonesia.” KnE Social Sciences 2019:694–705. doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i18.4759.
Tuli, Neha, and Archana Mantri. 2020. “Usability Principles for Augmented Reality Based Kindergarten Applications.” Procedia Computer Science 172(2019):679–87. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.089.
Ucus, Sukran. 2015. “Elementary School Teachers’ Views on Game-Based Learning as a Teaching Method.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186:401–9. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.216.
Vagg, Tamara, Joy Y. Balta, Aaron Bolger, and Mutahira Lone. 2020. “Multimedia in Education: What Do the Students Think?” Health Professions Education 6(3):325–33. doi: 10.1016/j.hpe.2020.04.011.
Vallejo-Correa, Paola, Julián Monsalve-Pulido, and Marta Tabares-Betancur. 2021. “Systematic Mapping Review of Context-Aware Analysis and Its Approach to Mobile Learning and Ubiquitous Learning Processe.” Computer Science Review 39:100335. doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100335.
Wahyuni, Nur, and Lala Jelita Ananda. 2021. “Development of Thematic Teaching Materials Based on Discovery Learning in Elementary School.” Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education (Jtlee) 4(1):122. doi: 10.33578/jtlee.v4i1.7861.
Weay, Ang Ling, and Mona Masood. 2015. “The ‘Big Picture’ of Thematic Multimedia Information Representation in Enhancing Learners’ Critical Thinking and History Reasoning.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197(February):2058–65. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.573.
Woschank, M., and Corina Pacher. 2020. “Teaching and Learning Methods in the Context of Industrial Logistics Engineering Education.” Procedia Manufacturing 51(2019):1709–16. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.238.
Wu, Po Han, Gwo Jen Hwang, Mei Ling Yang, and Chih Hung Chen. 2018. “Impacts of Integrating the Repertory Grid into an Augmented Reality-Based Learning Design on Students’ Learning Achievements, Cognitive Load and Degree of Satisfaction.” Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1294608.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
