The Needs Analysis in Developing Trig-GO App For Trigonometry Learning: A Qualitative Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.14Keywords:
Development, applications, trigonometry, need analysis,, mathematicsAbstract
Abstract - The rapid development in the world of technology and communication has contributed directly to the teaching and learning process. Therefore, a paradigm shift towards learning methods in the education system needs to be implemented to meet the educational aims of the 21st century. Therefore, this study aims to develop Trig-GO apps for mathematics in secondary schools by focusing on the topic of trigonometry. The development process of this application is guided by the model of Dick, Carey and Carey. The results of the development of the application prototype were evaluated through qualitative methods. The data was obtained from five experienced teachers and six students via observations, interviews and document analysis. Therefore, the results of the analysis showed that the Trig-GO application prototype developed need improvement. Thus, this also will give impact to the quality and production of the application prototype. The development of this prototype application is intended to assist teachers in teaching trigonometry through a digital approach.
Downloads
References
Sepeng, P. & Webb, P. 2012. Exploring mathematicaldiscussion in word problemsolving. Pythagoras 33(1). doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v33i1.60
Marshiza, H. 2012. Punca-punca kesilapan dan jenis-jenis kesilapan murid tahun tiga dalam menyelesaikan masalah bercerita matematik. Open University Malaysia.
Challenger, M. 2009. From triangles to a concept: a phenomenographic study of A-level students’ development of the concept of trigonometry. University of Warwick
Demir, O. 2012. Students’ concept development and understanding of sine and cosine functions. Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Gür, H. 2009. Trigonometry Learning The Production of three-dimensional complex objects based on mathematical functions by using Fused Deposition Modelling Method View project Trigonometry Learning. New Horizons in Education 57(1). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267851364
Jaworski, B. 2010. How We Teach: Inquiry in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education 1(2). doi:10.16949/turcomat.25415
Moore, K. C. 2012. Coherence, Quantitative Reasoning, and the Trigonometry of Students. Quantitative Reasoning and Mathematical Modeling: A Driver for STEM Integrated Education and Teaching in Context (January): 75–92.
İnan, C. 2013. Influence of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Students’ Levels of Learning Trigonometry and on Their Attitudes Towards Mathematics. Journal of Education 28(3): 219–234.
Orhun, N. 2004. Student’s Mistakes and Misconceptions on Teaching of Trigonometry. Anadolu University Science Faculty Mathemathics Department (1): 208–211.
Thompson, P. W. 2008. Conceptual Analysis of Mathematical Ideas: Some Spadework at the Foundation of Mathematics Education. Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 1(July): 45–64.
Weber, K. 2008. Teaching trigonometric functions: Lessons learned from research. Mathematics Teacher 17(3): 91–112. doi:doi.org/10.1007/BF03217423.
Yusha’u, M. A. 2013. Difficult Topics in Junior Secondary School Mathematics : Practical Aspect of Teaching and Learning Trigonometry. Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Science (2): 161–174.
Zengin, Y., Furkan, H. & Kutluca, T. 2012. The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31(2011): 183–187. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038
Mashira, Y., Rusyati, H., Nor Sazila, Z., Rohana, O. & Khairul Anuar, B. 2019. Amalan Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 (Pak21) Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pemudahcaraan (PdPc) Guru-Guru Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal IPDA 26: 13–24.
Soni, V. D. 2020. Global Impact of E-learning during COVID 19. SSRN Electronic Journal (June). doi:10.2139/ssrn.3630073
Ngu, B. H. & Phan, H. P. 2020. Learning to Solve Trigonometry Problems That Involve Algebraic Transformation Skills via Learning by Analogy and Learning by Comparison. Frontiers in Psychology 11(September): 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.558773
Natana, L. P., Angelita, D. M., Fernando, J. S. & Giovani, M. L. 2019. Good Practices In Virtual Teaching And Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review. Educação em Revist 35(214739): 1–24.
Che Ghani, C. K., Mai Shihah, A., Arasinah, K., Zaliza, H. & Ridzuan, C. 2016. Amalan Gaya pembelajaran pelajar cemerlang di Politeknik Seberang Perai: Kajian pelajar Malaysia berdasarkan model Felder Silvermen. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 12(3): 181–191.
[ 19 ] Sanchal, A. & Sharma, S. 2017. Students’ attitudes towards learning mathematics: Impact of teaching in a sporting context. Teachers and Curriculum 17(1): 89–99. doi:10.15663/tandc.v17i1.151
[ 20 ] Heng, K. & Sol, K. 2020. Online learning during COVID-19 : Key challenges and suggestions to enhance effectiveness (December): 1–15.
[ 21 ] Reiser, R. A. & Dempsey, J. V. 2012. Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Pearson Boston, MA.
[ 22 ] Ahmad Abdullahi, I. 2015. Comparative Analysis between System Approach, Kemp, and ASSURE Instructional Design Models Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Balancing The Nature-Nurture Conflicts On Child Intelligence Through Islamic Par. International Journal of Education and Research 3(12): 261–270. Retrieved from www.ijern.com
[ 23 ] Culatta, R. & Kearsley, G. 2016. Instructional Design.
[ 24 ] Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russel, J. D. & Smaldino, S. E. 1996. Instructional media and technologies for learning, hlm. Fifth Edit. NJ: Printice-Hall,Inc.
[ 25 ] Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M. & Kemp, J. E. 2004. Designing effective instruction, hlm. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[ 26 ] Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J. O. 2005. The systematic design of instruction, hlm. Edisi ke-6. United Stated: Pearson.
[ 27 ] Utama, A. A. G. S. 2016. The Usage of E-Learning Model To Optimize Learning System In Higher Education by Using Dick and Carey Design Approach. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence 2(1): 50. doi:10.20473/jisebi.2.1.50-56
[ 28 ] Mamattah, R. S. 2016. Students’ Perceptions of E-Learning 52. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:925978/FULLTEXT01.pdf
[ 29 ] D’Angelo, T., Bunch, J. C. & Thoron, A. 2018. Instructional Design Using the Dick and Carey Systems Approach. U.S. Department of Agricultural Education and Communication AEC362: 1–5.
[ 30 ] Chang, S. L. 2006. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 54(4): 417–420. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9606-0
Sari, R. H. Y. & Wutsqa, D. U. 2019. Analysis of student’s error in resolving the Pythagoras problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1320(1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012056
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research : Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, hlm. Edisi ke-4. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. 2016. Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Matematik Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 2. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Khairul Hasni, A. K., Norazah, M. N. & Zanaton, I. 2015. Reka bentuk dan Pembangunan Modul Sains(e-Smart) Berasaskan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme 5E dan Analogi : Satu Alternatif Strategi Pengajaran Bagi Menerapkan Kemahiran Berfikir Kreatif Murid. (unpublished) 1–12.
Nor Puteh, S. & Fareed Mohamed, N. 2013. An evaluation on the implementation of 5E instructional model in teaching geography in Sri Lanka. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 16(5): 721–728
Kong, J. 2011. Development and validation of the multicultural school-based consultation competency scale (Doctoral dissertation).
Strickland, J., Strickland, A., Wang, P., Zimmerly, L. & Moulton, S. 2013. Online course development using the ADDIE instruction design model: The need to establish validity. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2010, hlm. 2046–2054.
Lam, K. W., Hassan, A., Sulaiman, T. & Kamarudin, N. 2018. Evaluating the Face and Content Validity of an Instructional Technology Competency Instrument for University Lecturers in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 8(5): 367–385. doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i5/4108
Faizal Amin Nur, Y. 2015. Pembangunan Model Pemindahan Pembelajaran Sistem Latihan Kemahiran Malaysia Berasaskan National Occupational Skill Standard (NOSS). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Mohd Effendi Ewan, M. M., Hisyamsani, I., Normawati, A. R. & Ahmad Zamri, K. 2017. Kesahan Kandungan Pakar Instrumen IKBAR Bagi Pengukuran AQ Menggunakan Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan. Proseeding of International Conference On Global Education V (ICGE V) (April): 979–997.
Lam, K. W., Hassan, A., Sulaiman, T. & Kamarudin, N. 2018. Evaluating the Face and Content Validity of an Instructional Technology Competency Instrument for University Lecturers in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 8(5): 367–385. doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i5/4108
Stewart, J. & Haswell, K. 2013. Assessing readiness to work in primary health care: The content validity of a self-check tool for physiotherapists and other health professionals. Journal of Primary Health Care 5(1): 70–73. doi:10.1071/hc13070
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K., Angeles, L., et al. 1968. "Dentists face added drug regulation. Dental survey 44(12): 73. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.Purposeful
Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A. 2002. 2002. Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Qualitative Marketing Research. St Paul, Minnesota, USA. doi:10.4135/9781849209625.n8
Berliner, D. C. 2001. Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research 35(5): 463–482. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6
Asfyra, I. B., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I. & Hartono, Y. 2020. Mathematics learning of trigonometric triangles in vocational high school using online media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1663(1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012025
Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice 41(4): 212–218.
Leslie, O. W. 2016. Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy 1–7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
