The Validity and Reliability of IoJEPD Model Instruments to Improve Elementary School Teacher Competence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.24Keywords:
Validity, Reliability, model, TeacherAbstract
This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the IoJEPD model instrument to improve the competence of elementary school teachers. This study uses content validity. Quantitative methods and professional experts are the considerations used in this research. The stage of proving the validity of this instrument is carried out utilizing a validation process involving three experts in the fields of learning, evaluation, and experts in the field of instrument preparation. Validity is carried out in the form of a rating scale, which is shown at the level of agreement of the validator rating on the validation items and the Cronbach Alpha Coefficient to measure reliability. The results showed that: a) 15 items of interview guidelines were valid with a validity index range of 0.883; b) 17 items of valid teacher response questionnaire with a validity index range of 0.877;c) 50 valid pedagogical competency questionnaires with a validity index range of 0.865, and d) 40 valid professional competency questionnaires with a validity index range of 0.838. With Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, the reliability of the pedagogical competency test above is 0.901 and the professional competency test is 0.810. So it can be concluded that the scale is valid and very reliable to measure the professional and pedagogic competence of elementary school teachers.
Downloads
References
Agung Setiabudi, M. H. (2019). An Analysis of Validity and Reliability of A Teacher-Made Test (Case Study at XI Grade of SMA N 6 Bengkulu). Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 3(4), 522-532.
Aiken, L. R. (1996). Personality Assessment: Methods and Practices (Second Edition). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publisher.
Akhyak, B. Y. (2013). Implementation of teachers' pedagogy competence to optimize learners' development in public primary Schools in Indonesia. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(9), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.8.14
Basow, S. (2010). Best and worst professors: Gender patterns in students choices. Sex Roles, 34(1), 407-417.
David W. Brooks, K. J. (2015). Using an Interactive, Compensatory Model of Learning to Improve Chemistry Teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 7(2), 637-640.
Desstya, A. (2018). Validitas Reabilitas Instrument Technologycal Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru Sekolah Dasar Muatan Pelajaran IPA. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Basic Of Education, 3(1), 126-139. doi:10.24269/ajbe.v3i1.1338
Dewi, L. (2014). Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Melalui Pelatihan Paikem (Pelatihan Pada Guru MI dan MTs di Kabupaten Cianjur),. Editech, 1(3), 1-14. doi:10.17509/edutech.v13i3.3094
Gedviliene, G. (2014). The Social Competence Development Concept in Higher Education. European Scientific Journal, 10(28), 778-788.
Ishak, R. &. (2018). The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning with Academic Staff Readiness for Education 4.0. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), 169-184. doi:10.1177/0340035219896376
Kleickmann, T. (2013). Teachers' Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Role of Structural Differences in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398
Liakopoulou, M. (2011). The professional competence of teachers: Which qualities, attitudes, skills, and Knowledge contribute to a teacher's effectiveness? International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(21), 66-78.
Likamulyanti. (2010). Pentingnya Kompetensi Profesional dan Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Fundadikdas, 4(2), 1-9.
Martin, D. B. (2007). Beyond missionaries or cannibals: Who should teach mathematics to African American children? High School Journal, 91(1), 6-28.
Merkt, M. (2017). The importance of academic teaching competence for the career development of university teachers: A comment from higher education pedagogy. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 34(4), 1-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001125
Pepe, A. (2013). Comparison of occupational stress in response to challenging behaviors between general and special education primary teachers in Northern Italy. International Journal of Special Education, 13(1), 11-23. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103244
Popoola, A. (2013). Teacher pedagogical competence in teaching and learning in the perception of teachers' knowledge, attitude, and teaching skills as a predictor of academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Review, 2(9), 165-171.
Roelofs, E. (2017). Towards a Framework for Assessing Teacher Competence. European Journal of Vocational Training, 40(1), 123-139.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor Faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sukadari. (2019). Professional competency instrument validity of assessment on teacher work performance. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(6), 188-198.
Thornburgh, K. M. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 527-535.
Wilfried Admiraal, M. H.-T. (2011). Assessment of teacher competence using video portfolios: Reliability, construct validity, and consequential validity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1019-1028.
Yusnita, Y. (2018). The Effect of Professional Education and Training for Teachers (PLPG) in Improving Pedagogic Competence and Teacher Performance. Tadris: Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 3(2), 123-130. doi:https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.2701
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
