Integration of Blended Learning and Project-Based Learning (BPjBL) on Achievement of Students’ learning goals: A Meta-analysis study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.04.32Keywords:
Diversity of Learning Needs, blended project-based learning, effect size, meta-analysisAbstract
Many studies have identified the effect of integrating blended learning and project-based learning (BPjBL) models on student achievement. However, the results of previous studies showed inconsistent results. Therefore, this study aims to determine the differences in the effectiveness of the integration of blended learning and project-based learning (BPjBL) models on student achievement, compared to traditional learning. The design used was a contrast group meta-analysis, analyzing 15 effect sizes from 11 primary studies that met the inclusion criteria. The results of the analysis using the random effect approach obtained an overall effect size of (d = 1.28; p < 0.05), this effect size is in the large effect category. It can be concluded that the use of the BPjBL model has a major effect on student achievement when compared to traditional learning (d = 1.28; p < 0.05). The findings of this meta-analysis show the consistency of the publication of research results regarding the effect of using the BPjBL model on student achievement.
Downloads
References
Adeyemo, S. A., & Babajide, V. F. (2014). Effects of mastery learning approach on students’ achievement in physics.
Aliftika, O., Astra, I. M., & Supriyati, Y. (2021). Project Based Blended Learning and Independent Learning on Critical Thinking Skill. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, 012051.
Ayaz, M. F., & Söylemez, M. (2015). The effect of the project-based learning approach on the academic achievements of the students in science classes in Turkey: A meta-analysis study. Egitim ve Bilim, 40(178), 255-283.
Balemen, N., & Keskin, M. Ö. (2018). The effectiveness of Project-Based Learning on science education: A meta-analysis search. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 849-865.
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14-17, 20-22, 43-46.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Pynoo, B., & Struyven, K. (2019). Experts’ insights about blended learning implementation: What teacher attributes are relevant? Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Learning, ECEL, 639–XI.
Carnoy, M., Chisholm, L., & Chilisa, B. (2012). The low achievement trap: Comparing schooling in Botswana and South Africa. HSRC Press.
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International journal of educational technology in Higher education, 15(1), 1-16.
Freeman‐Green, S. M., O'Brien, C., Wood, C. L., & Hitt, S. B. (2015). Effects of the SOLVE strategy on the mathematical problem solving skills of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(2), 76-90.
Hujjatusnaini, N., Corebima, A. D., Prawiro, S. R., & Gofur, A. (2022). The Effect of Blended Project-based Learning Integrated with 21st-Century Skills on Pre-Service Biology Teachers' Higher-order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.27148
Husamah, H. (2015). Blended project based learning: Metacognitive awareness of biology education new students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(4), 274-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i4.2121
Ledward, B. C., & Hirata, D. (2011). An overview of 21st century skills. Summary of 21st Century Skills for Students and Teachers, by Pacific Policy Research Center. Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools–Research & Evaluation, 20.
Li, C., He, J., Yuan, C., Chen, B., & Sun, Z. (2019). The effects of blended learning on knowledge, skills, and satisfaction in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse education today, 82, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.004
Li, S., & Wang, W. (2022). Effect of blended learning on student performance in K‐12 settings: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12696
Lipsky, M. S., & Cone, C. J. (2018). A review of mastery learning: The roseman model as an illustrative case. Education for Health, 31(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.239045
Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 18(1), e4807. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4807
López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N., & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2020). Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2
Lusa, H., Adnan, A., & Yurniwati, Y. (2021). Effect of Blended Learning on Students' Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 11(2), 309-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202113
Mufida, S. N., Sigit, D. V., & Ristanto, R. H. (2020). Integrated project-based e-learning with science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (PjBeL-STEAM): its effect on science process skills. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(2), 183-200.
Mursid, R., Saragih, A. H., & Hartono, R. (2022). The Effect of the Blended Project-Based Learning Model and Creative Thinking Ability on Engineering Students' Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(1), 218-235. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2244
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Kumano, Y. (2018). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skill of Middle School through STEM Education Project-Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495
Oktarina, K., Suhaimi, S., Santosa, T. A., Razak, A., Irdawati, I., Ahda, Y., ... & Putri, D. H. (2021). Meta-Analysis: The Effectiveness of Using Blended Learning on Multiple Intelligences and Student Character Education During the Covid-19 Period. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 4(3), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v4i3.5505
Ozden, M., & Gultekin, M. (2008). The effects of brain-based learning on academic achievement and retention of knowledge in science course. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education.
Pérez-Escolar, M., Ordóñez-Olmedo, E., & Alcaide-Pulido, P. (2021). Fact-Checking Skills and Project-Based Learning about Infodemic and Disinformation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100887
Prayitno, B. A., & Suciati. (2017). Narrowing the Gap of Science Students’ Learning Outcomes Through INSTAD Strategy. The New Educational Review, 50, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.50.4.10
Prayitno, B. A., Sugiharto, B., & Suciati, S. (2013). Prototipe Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivis-Kolaboratif Untuk Memberdayakan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Akademik Bawah. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning, 10(1).
Prayitno, B. A., Sugiharto, B., & Titikusumawati, E. (2022). Effectiveness of Collaborative Constructivist Strategies to Minimize Gaps in Students’ Understanding of Biological Concepts. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(11), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i11.29891
Putra, A. K., Sumarmi., Deffinika, I., & Islam, M. N. (2021). The effect of blended projectbased learning with stem approach to spatial thinking ability and geographic skill. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 685-704. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14340a
Putri, S. U., & Hendawati, Y. (2018, January). Blended project based learning: Strategy for improving critical thinking of pre-service teachers in science education. In Proceedings of the UR International Conference on Educational Sciences (pp. 152-157).
Ramadhani, R., & Fitri, Y. (2020). A Project-based learning into flipped classroom for ePUB3 electronic mathematics learning module (eMLM)-based on course design and implementation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 3119-3135.
Setiawan, A. A., Muhtadi, A., & Hukom, J. (2022). Blended learning and student mathematics ability in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15249a
Siddaiah-Subramanya, M., Smith, S., & Lonie, J. (2017). Mastery learning: how is it helpful? An analytical review. Advances in medical education and practice, 8, 269. https://doi.org/10.2147%2FAMEP.S131638
Silvi, F., & Maryono, D. (2020, May). The Influence of Project-Based Blended Learning Toward Outcomes Student Learning. In International Conference on Online and Blended Learning 2019 (ICOBL 2019) (pp. 63-65). Atlantis Press.
Sumarmi, S., Bachri, S., Irawan, L., Aliman, M., & Ahmad, W. W. (2021). Project-Based Research Learning (PBRL) Integrated With E-Learning in Projects Completion. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(7), 16-31.
Taylor, N, & Taylor, S. (2013). Teacher knowledge and professional habitus. In N. Taylor, S. van der Berg, & T. Mabogoane (Eds.), Creating effective schools (pp. 204-233). Pearson.
Taylor, N., & Vinjevold, P. (1999). Getting learning right: Report of the President’s Education Initiative Research Project. Joint Education Trust.
Telaumbanua, S. (2022). The Effect of Project Based Blended Learning Towards Negotiation Text Writing Ability Moderated by Learning Motivation. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2327-2334. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1159
Tika, I. N., & Agustiana, I. G. A. T. (2021). The Effect of a Blended Learning Project Based Learning Model on Scientific Attitudes and Science Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(4), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i4.39869
Tong, Y., & Wei, X. (2020). Teaching design and practice of a project-based blended learning model. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 12(1), 33-50.
Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(8), e16504. https://doi.org/10.2196/16504
Vesikivi, P., Lakkala, M., Holvikivi, J., & Muukkonen, H. (2020). The impact of project-based learning curriculum on first-year retention, study experiences, and knowledge work competence. Research Papers in Education, 35(1), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677755
Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002
Wahyudi, W. (2020). The effectiveness of sharing blended project based learning (SBPBL) model implementation in operating system course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(5), 202-211.
Yustina, Y., Syafii, W., & Vebrianto, R. (2020). The Effects of Blended Learning and Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Biology Teachers Creative Thinking through Online Learning in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.