Numeration Problems in Elementary School Mathematics Learning in Semarang from the Teacher’s Perspective

Authors

  • Lisa Virdinarti Putra Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Sukestiyarno Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Masrukan Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Joko Widodo Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.04.08

Keywords:

numeracy, mathematics learning, elementary school class teachers, numeracy learning

Abstract

Learning is a series of activities arranged by the teacher that involves both mental and physical processes through the interaction of students and teachers with the learning environment and learning resources as well as between students and students to achieve the specified competencies. One of them is numeracy learning in mathematics learning, which cannot be separated from the attention of educational researchers, practitioners, and experts. Numeration is a person's ability to reason, analyze, formulate, interpret, and solve problems. Ability in numeracy becomes very important for elementary school students to have. This study will look at problems related to numeracy in elementary school mathematics learning in Semarang district and Semarang city.  In this qualitative-descriptive study, the research subjects were selected purposively, consisting of elementary school class teachers in Semarang. The instrument in this study was questionnaires, observations, and interviews with elementary school class teachers. The study's results indicate that several aspects affect the implementation of numeracy in elementary school mathematics learning. Problems in learning mathematics related to numeracy include low teacher competence, lack of infrastructure that supports numeracy, incomplete teaching resources, and parental support in learning numeracy in elementary school mathematics learning.

 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amira Diniaty. (2011). Learning is shown by a change in behavior as a result of experience.”Dukungan Orangtua terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa. 10–37.

Benny, A.P. 2004. Ketersediaan dan Pemanfaatan Media dan Teknoligi Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. http://pk.ut.ac.id/jp/52sept04/ 52benny.htm. Diakses tanggal 2 Maret 2022.

Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher Preparation and Student Achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709353129

Blömeke, S. 2017. “Modelling Teachers’ Professional Competence as a Multi-dimensional Construct.” In Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession, edited by S. Guerriero, 119–135. Paris: OECD.

Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Hughes, K., Pfannenstiel, J., & Porterfield, R. G. (2011). Early Numeracy Intervention Program for First-Grade Students with Mathematics Difficulties. Exceptional Students, 78(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107800101

Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan. (2007). Manajamen Sarana Dan Prasarana Pendidikan Persekolahan Berbasis Sekolah. Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik Dan Tenaga Kependidikan, 6–99.

Dubeck, M. M., Jukes, M. C. H., & Okello, G. (2012). Early primary literacy instruction in Kenya. Comparative Education Review, 56(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1086/660693

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A.-T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). Education: The Mediating Role of Teaching Quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (2009). “What’s in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44(1)

Goleman, Daniel, Emitional Intelligence Kecerdasan Emosional Mengapa EQ Lebih Penting Daripada IQ, Jakata: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2004.

Guerreiro, S. (ed. . (2017). Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. In Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en%0Ahttp://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pedagogical-knowledge-and-the-changing-nature-of-the-teaching-profession_9789264270695-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pedagogical-knowledge-and-the-changing-na

Han H, Moon H, Lee H. Physical classroom environment affects students’ satisfaction: attitude and quality as mediators. Social Behav. Pers.: Int. J. 2019;47(5):1–10.

Herawati, N., Tobari, & Missriani. (2020). Analisis Pengelolaan Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 20 Tanjung Raja Kabupaten Ogan Ilir. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 4(2), 1684–1690.

Hewett, B. L., & Powers, C. E. (2007). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Online Teaching and Learning: Preparation, Development, and Organizational Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250709336574

Hidayati, V. R., Wulandari, N. P., Maulyda, M. A., Erfan, M., & Rosyidah, A. N. K. (2020). Literasi Matematika Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah PISA Konten Shape & Space. JPMI: Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i3.

Kaiser, G., and J. König. 2019. “Competence Measurement in (Mathematics) Teacher Education and Beyond: Implications for Policy.” Higher Education Policy 32: 597–615. doi:10.1057/s41307-019- 00139-z.

Kim, Y.-S. G., Boyle, H. N., Zulkowski, S. S., & Nakamura, P. (2016). Landscape report on early grade literacy. December 2016, 1–92. https://allchildrenreading.org/resources/usaid-landscape-report-early-grade-literacy/%0Awww.globalreadingnetwork.net

Kompri. 2016. Motivasi Pembelajaran Perspektif Guru dan Siswa. Bandung: PT Rosda Karya.

Koswara, D.D. dan Halimah.(2008). Bagaimana Menjadi Guru Kreatif? Bandung: PT Pribumi Mekar

Kurniasari, E. (2019). Pengaruh Perhatian Orang Tua Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Viii Smp N 1 Karanganom. ABSIS: Mathematics Education Journal, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.32585/absis.v1i1.306

Lee, J., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2015). ‘Making do’: Teachers’ coping strategies for dealing with textbook shortages in urban Zambia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.008.

Lestari, R., Faelasofi, R., & Suminto, S. (2021). Efektivitas Penggunaan Modul Numerasi Pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh. JURNAL E-DuMath, 7(2), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.52657/je.v7i2.1543

Maba, W. (2018). Conducting assessment instrument models for teacher competence, teacher welfare as an effort to enhance education quality. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(3), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v5i3.667

Milner, H. R. (2014). Scripted and Narrowed Curriculum Reform in Urban Schools. Urban Education, 49(7), 743–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914549685

Miranda, Jonathan, et. al., 2021. Computers and Electrical Engineering

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610

Mol, S. E., & Neuman, S. B. (2014). Sharing information books with kindergartners: The role of parents’ extra-textual talk and socioeconomic status. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.001

Nasrudin, N., & Maryadi, M. (2019). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan dalam Pembelajaran di SD. Manajemen Pendidikan, 13(2), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.23917/jmp.v13i2.6363

Nations, U. (2016). Place :

Ningsih, R., & Nurrahmah, A. (2016). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar dan Perhatian Orang Tua Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 6(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v6i1.754

OECD. (1967). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (Draft). 2nd draft 32-40. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 5–24. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa-2021-mathematics-framework-draft.pdf

Piper, B., Simmons Zuilkowski, S., Dubeck, M., Jepkemei, E., & King, S. J. (2018). Identifying the essential ingredients to literacy and numeracy improvement: Teacher professional development and coaching, student textbooks, and structured teachers’ guides. World Development, 106, 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.018

Reeves, J. (2010). Teacher learning by script. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810365252

Sanjaya, Wina. 2010. Kurikulum dan pembelajaran, Teori dan praktek Pengembangan Kurikulum KTSP. Jakarta: Kencana.

Slameto, S. (2014). Permasalahan-Permasalahan Terkait Dengan Profesi Guru Sd. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2014.v4.i3.p1-12

Suprihatin, S. (2015). Upaya Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Promosi: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi, 3(1).

Tout, D. (2020). Critical Connections Between Numeracy and Mathematics. Department of Education and Training, 1–11. https://research.acer.edu.au/learning_processes/29

Van Brummelen, H. (2009). Berjalan dengan Tuhan di dalam Kelas. Tangerang: UPH Press.

Widiantari, N. K. K., Suparta, I. N., & Sariyasa, S. (2022). Meningkatkan Literasi Numerasi dan Pendidikan Karakter dengan E-Modul Bermuatan Etnomatematika di Era Pandemi COVID-19. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 10(2), 331. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v10i2.10218

Widodo, Adi, S., & Wahyudin. (2018). Selection of Learning Media Mathematics for Junior School Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 17(1), 154–160

Downloads

Published

2023-07-28

How to Cite

Putra, L. V., Sukestiyarno, Masrukan, & Joko Widodo. (2023). Numeration Problems in Elementary School Mathematics Learning in Semarang from the Teacher’s Perspective. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.04.08

Issue

Section

Article