Dominant Variabels Analysis of Managerial Effectiveness in State University with Legal Entity Status

Authors

  • Asep Sunandar
  • Burhanuddin Burhanuddin
  • Nurul Ulfatin
  • Athala Naufal Bhayangkara
  • Ediyanto Ediyanto
  • Deni Hadiana
  • Melor MD Yunus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.02.14

Keywords:

autonomy, organizational structure, working mechanism, organizational culture

Abstract

The construction of an organization aims to enhance the performance and versatility of the organization for society. Consequently, as a platform for training human resources, universities have to develop constantly, following the community's insistence. In 2022, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology
specified 21 state universities with legal entities. The status of a state university with a legal entity presents extensive autonomy in the field of academic, asset, and financial management. Besides, the universities also carry an obligation for university management to develop their institution. This study aims to identify the dominant variables for the state university with legal entity development. This study used a literature review method with a case analysis involving a number of universities. The analysis results suggested that the dominant variables in the universities development included the organization structure, working mechanism or organizational guidelines, the organizational climate and culture, along with the use of technology devices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahyar. (2020). Inovasi Mutu dalam Organisasi: Analisis Praktik Manajerial. Mataram: Al-Haramain Lombok.

Anderson, P. J. J., Blatt, R., Christianson, M. K., Grant, A. M., Marquis, C., Neuman, E. J., … Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Understanding mechanisms in organizational research: Reflections from a collective journey. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605280231

Bai, W., Feng, Y., Yue, Y., & Feng, L. (2017). Organizational Structure, Cross-functional Integration and Performance of New Product Development Team. Procedia Engineering, 174, 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.198

Baron, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (1990). Behavior in Organization: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work (3th ed.). Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.

Burhanuddin, B., & Sunarni, S. (2017). Pengukuran Budaya Organisasi Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Efektivitas Kepemimpinan Di Sekolah Dasar. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan, 26(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v26i12017p001

Cragg, T., & Loske, D. (2019). Perceived work autonomy in order picking systems: An empirical analysis. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 1872–1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.475

Cramm, J. M., Strating, M. M. H., & Nieboer, A. P. (2013). The influence of organizational characteristics on employee solidarity in the long-term care sector. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(3), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06027.x

Da’as, R., & Zibenberg, A. (2021). Conflict, control and culture: implications for implicit followership and leadership theories. Educational Review, 73(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1601614

Daft, R. L. (2008). Organization Design and Theory.

Davis, G. F. (2006). Mechanisms and the theory of organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605280238

Du Gay, P. (2015). Organization (Theory) As A Way Of Life. Journal of Cultural Economy, 8(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2015.1040642

Dwiyanto, A. (2008). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Fachriansyah, K., & Sulastri, E. (2019). Evaluasi Pengembangan PTN-BH sebagai Pusat Unggulan (Centre of Excellence). (April), 50. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21825.92007

Gurianova, E., & Mechtcheriakova, S. (2015). Design of Organizational Structures of Management According to Strategy of Development of the Enterprises. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24(July), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00695-4

Haris, I. (2012). Determinant Factors of Decision Making Process in Higher Education Institution (A Case of State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(18), 33–40.

Ivancevich, G. (2006). Organizations Behavior Structure Process. New York: Mc-Graw Hill Book.

Kellner, A., Ringhofer, S., Hehenberger, P., Weingartner, L., & Friedl, M. (2016). The Impact on Organizational Structures of Model-based Mechatronic System Design. Procedia Technology, 26, 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.043

Klemsdal, L., & Clegg, S. (2022). Defining the work situation in organization theory: bringing Goffman back in. Culture and Organization, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2022.2090563

Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2001). Organizational behavior. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

Kurnia, S. S., Kuswarno, E., Maryani, E., & Firmansyah. (2021). The characteristics of investigative news organizations in Indonesia between 2010-2012. Heliyon, 7(2), e06276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06276

Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntabilitas Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Nagy, K., & Hajrizi, E. (2018). Automatic control in support of modular innovation. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(30), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.263

Niedermeier, F. (2017). Designing Effective Quality Management Systems in Higher Education. In Training on Internal Quality Assurance Series. https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/43222

Olszak, C. M., & Olszak, C. M. (2022). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Business Intelligence Systems for Innovative Development of Business Intelligence Systems for Innovative Development of Organizations Organizations. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 1754–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.233

Purwoatmodjo, D. (2008). artikel unnes.pdf. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, Vol 6 No 1.

Rahimi, A., Mazdai, K., & Shekarey, A. (2010). Typology of modern management style in the systematic design of geometric models of management disciplines of Iranian educational organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.160

Raikov, A. N. (2016). Organizational Structure Optimization with the Questions-Criteria Hierarchy. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 1532–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.797

Robbins & Timothy. (2012). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Robbins, S. (2003). Organizational Behaviors. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education: Third edition. In Total Quality Management in Education: Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417010

San Cristóbal, J. R., Fernández, V., & Diaz, E. (2018). An analysis of the main project organizational structures: Advantages, disadvantages, and factors affecting their selection. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 791–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.103

Schein. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Shindina, T. A. (2016). Organization of Interaction between the Participants in Modern Construction. Procedia Engineering, 150(351), 2113–2118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.249

Sunandar, A., & Imron, A. (2020). The Model of University Autonomy in Indonesia. 381(CoEMA), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.2991/coema-19.2019.12

Tosi, H. L. (2000). Managing Organizational Behavior (4th ed.). CArlton Victoria Australia: Blackwell Publising.

Tsiring, D., & Sizova, Y. (2018). The Peculiarities of the Adherence and Identification as Components of the Organizational Culture of Modern University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 665–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.048

UNODC. (2011). Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption—Basic Documents.

Wibowo. (2013). Budaya Organisasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Wursanto. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Organisasi (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership In Organizations (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-10

How to Cite

Sunandar, A., Burhanuddin, B., Ulfatin, N., Bhayangkara, A. N., Ediyanto, E., Hadiana, D., & Yunus, M. M. (2024). Dominant Variabels Analysis of Managerial Effectiveness in State University with Legal Entity Status . Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.02.14

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): PEGEGOG

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.