Retention Achievement in Brain-Based Whole Learning is Supported by Students’ Scientific Literacy and Concept Mastery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.30Keywords:
biology learningAbstract
The learning model should be able to improve student's learning abilities. The Brain-Based Whole Learning (BBWL) model is one of the alternative learning models that can improve students' retention achievement, supported by scientific literacy and concept mastery. This study aims to determine the effect of the BBWL model on students' scientific literacy, concept mastery, and retention. This research method was quasi-experimental, with a sample of four classes taken randomly. The total sample was 132 students in grade XI Science Specialization in Madrasah Aliyah Bengkulu who enrolled in Biology. The data were analyzed using the ANOVA test after the assumption test was carried out, namely the normality and data homogeneity test. The results showed an effect of the BBWL model on students' scientific literacy skills, concept mastery, and retention. There is a significant difference between the BBWL model with BBL, WBT, and control. Based on the study results, it can be concluded that the BBWL model can improve students' retention achievement by supporting the result of good scientific literacy and concept mastery.
Downloads
References
Afoan, M. Y., & Corebima, A. D. (2018). The Correlation of Metacognitive Skills and Learning Results Toward Students’ Retention of Biology Learning: Students Learning Only to Pass Examinations. Educational Process: International Journal, 7(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2018.73.1
Alfred, M. C., Neyens, D. M., & Gramopadhye, A. K. (2019). Learning in Simulated Environments: An Assessment of 4-week Retention Outcomes. Applied Ergonomics, 74(July 2018), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.002
Amstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong’s Handbook Of Performance Manajemen. AnEvi Dence-Based Guide To Delivering High-Performance India: By ReplikaPress Pvt L Td.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. . (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing (A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives). New York. Addison Wesley Longman, INC.
Anderson, S. J., Hecker, K. G., Krigolson, O. E., & Jamniczky, H. A. (2018). A Reinforcement-Based Learning Paradigm Increases Anatomical Learning and Retention—A Neuroeducation Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00038
Akyürek, E., & Afacan, O. (2013). Effects of Brain-Based Learning Approach on Students’ Motivation and Attitudes Levels in Science Class. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 3(1), 104–119.
Angraini, Gustia. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Kelas X Di Kota Solok (Analysis of Science Literacy Ability of Class X High School Students in Solok City). Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences Forum 2014
Arievitch, I. M. (2020). The Vision of Developmental Teaching and Learning and Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.01.007
Bauer, J. R., & Booth, A. E. (2019). Exploring Potential Cognitive Foundations of Scientific Literacy in Preschoolers: Causal Reasoning and Executive Function. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.09.007
Bawaneh, A. K. A., Zain, A. N. M., Saleh, S., & Abdullah, A. G. K. (2012). Using Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method to Enhance Students’ Motivation Towards Science Learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(3).
Biffle, C. (2013). Whole Brain Teaching Review. Whole Brain Teaching for Challenging Kids, 172–177.
Blum, S., Klaproth, O., & Russwinkel, N. (2022). Cognitive Modeling of Anticipation: Unsupervised Learning and Symbolic Modeling of Pilots’ Mental Representations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12594
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1994). Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain. In Journal of Arts and Humanities (Vol. 3).
Cannady, M. A., Vincent-Ruz, P., Chung, J. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Scientific Sensemaking Supports Science Content Learning Across Disciplines and Instructional Contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101802
Carlson, C. R., & Curran, S. L. (1994). Stretch-Based Relaxation Training. Patient Education and Counseling, 23(1), 5–12.
Cheddak, A., Baha, T. A., El-Hajji, M., & Es-Saady, Y. (2021). Towards a Support System for Brainstorming Based Content-Based Information Extraction and Machine Learning. Business Intelligence, 416(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76508-8_4
Clark, H. W. S. (2016). Effect of Whole Brain Teaching on Student Self-Concept [Walden University]. In Dissertations. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1775490653?accountid=14504%0Ahttp://godot.lib.sfu.ca/GODOT/hold_tab.cgi?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+A%26I&a
Crosling, G., Heagney, M., & Thomas, L. (2009). Improving Student Retention in Higher Education Improving Teaching and Learning. Australian Universities Review, 51(2), 9–18.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
Demirel, M., & Caymaz, B. (2015). Prospective Science and Primary School Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs in Scientific Literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1903–1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.500
DeSipio, J., Perlis, S., & Phadtare, S. (2018). One-a-Day Nutrition Questions to Enhance Learning and Retention of Nutrition Concepts for Medical Students. Medical Science Educator, 28(4), 811–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0616-4
Dewberry, C., & Jackson, D. J. R. (2018). An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Student Retention. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.03.005
Dragoş, V., & Mih, V. (2015). Scientific Literacy in School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.273
Eagleton, S., & Muller, A. (2011). Development of a Model for Whole Brain Learning of Physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(4), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00007.2011
Einolander, J., & Vanharanta, H. (2015). Assessment of Student Retention using the Evolute Approach, an Overview. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(1), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.269
Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (2014). Creating the Conditions for Scientific Literacy: A Re-Examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002261
Gargrish, S., Kaur, D. P., Mantri, A., Singh, G., & Sharma, B. (2021). Measuring Effectiveness of Augmented Reality-Based Geometry Learning Assistant on Memory Retention Abilities of the Students in 3D Geometry. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22424
Georgieff, M. K., Ramel, S. E., & Cusick, S. E. (2018). Nutritional Influences on Brain Development. Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, 107(8), 1310–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14287
Gogus, A. (2012). Brainstorming and Learning. In: Seel N.M. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 484–488). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Gozuyesil, E., & Dikici, A. (2014). The Effect of Brain-Based Learning on Academic Achievement: A Meta-analytical Study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 642–648. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.2.2103
Guida, A., Tardieu, H., & Nicolas, S. (2009). The Personalisation Method Applied to a Working Memory Task: Evidence of Long-term Working Memory Effects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 862–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802236369
Gyamah, G. (2022). Effectiveness of Group Investigation Versus Lecture-Based Instruction on Students’ Concept Mastery and Transfer in Social Studies. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 6(1), 1–15.
Haghighi, M. (2013). The Effect of Brain-Based Learning on Iranian EFL Achievement and Retention. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70(1), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.088
Hamel, R., Côté, K., Matte, A., Lepage, J. F., & Bernier, P. M. (2019). Rewards Interact With Repetition-dependent Learning to Enhance Long-term Retention of Motor Memories. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1452(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14171
Hikmawati, V. Y. (2018). Profil Retensi Pengetahuan Siswa Sma Pada Materi Sistem Pertahanan Tubuh Melalui Metode Membaca SQ5R (Knowledge Retention Profile of High School Students on Body Defense System Materials Through the SQ5R, Reading Method). Jurnal Bio Educatio, 3(1), 90–98.
Himawan, M. W. H., Wartono, & Yuliati, L. (2016). Kemampuan Awal dan Literasi Sains Siswa SMK terkait Materi Elastisitas (Initial Ability and Science Literacy of Vocational High School Students related to Elasticity Materials). Proseding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, 329–333.
Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A. S. (2020). Influence of Students’ Learning Style, Sense of Presence, and Cognitive Load on Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867422Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New Minds for A Changing World. Issues and Trends, 82(1), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.3.CO;2-Q
Hughes, M., Hughes, P., & Hodgkinson, I. R. (2017). In Pursuit of a “Whole-brain” Approach to Undergraduate Teaching: Implications of the Herrmann Brain Dominance Model. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2389–2405. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1152463
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New Minds for A Changing World. Issues and Trends, 82(1), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.3.CO;2-Q
Kalkan, Ö. K., Altun, A., & Atar, B. (2020). Role of Teacher-Related Factors and Educational Resources in Science Literacy: An International Perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100935
Kamuche, F. (2015). Relationship of Time and Learning Retention. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 2(8), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v2i8.1851
Karaçalli, S., & Korur, F. (2014). The Effects of Project-Based Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement, Attitude, and Retention of Knowledge: The Subject of “Electricity in Our Lives.” School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12071
Kharsati, P., D., & Prakasha G.S. (2017). Whole Brain Teaching. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) 22. 6. (2):76-83. Dari: www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2022%20Issue6/...2/L2206027683.pdf
Klingenberg, S., Jørgensen, M. L. M., Dandanell, G., Skriver, K., Mottelson, A., & Makransky, G. (2020). Investigating the Effect of Teaching as A Generative Learning Strategy When Learning Through Desktop and Immersive VR: A Media and Methods Experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2115–2138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13029
Klucevsek, K. (2017). The Intersection of Information and Science Literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(2), 354–365. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1166457.pdf
Kula, S. S., & Budak, Y. (2020). The Effects of Reciprocal Teaching on Reading Comprehension, Retention on Learning and Self-Efficacy Perception. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 10(2), 493–552. https://doi.org/10.14527/PEGEGOG.2020.017
Kusumaningrum, V., Waluyo, J., Prihatin, J., & Ihsanullah. (2021). The Development of Textbook Based on Brain-Based Learning (BBL) in Material Organization System of Life for the Junior High School Science. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 747(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/747/1/012111
Lee, L.-T., & Hung, J. C. (2009). Effect of Teaching Using Whole Brain Instruction on Accounting Learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 7(3), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-539-1.ch016
Le Roux, I. (2011). New Large Class Pedagogy: Developing Students’ Whole Brain Thinking Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.116
Merritt, S. (2003). Simfoni Otak 39 Aktivitas Music Yang Merangsang IQ, EQ, SQ Untuk Membangkitkan Kreativitas dan Imajinasi (Brain Symphony 39 Music Activities That Stimulate IQ, EQ, SQ To Awaken Creativity and Imagination). Bandung Kaifa.
Mitee, T. L., & Obaitan, G. N. (2015). Effect of Mastery Learning on Senior Secondary School Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcome in Quantitative Chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(5), 34–38. http://search.proquest.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/docview/1773220132?accountid=12372
Moghaddam, A. N., & Araghi, S. M. (2013). Brain-Based Aspects of Cognitive Learning Approaches in Second Language Learning. English Language Teaching, 6(5), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n5p55
Morris, J. L. (2016). Music, Play, and Dream, Individuation Through Imagination. In Dissertation (Vol. 7, Issue 2). Proquest LLC.
Mulyono, O., Bustomi, Y., & Julung, H. (2017). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Biologi Sekolah Menengah Pertama Melalui Metode Demonstras (Improving Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Junior High School Biology Students Through the Demonstration Method). JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 2(2), 15–19.
Nasution. (2006). Berbagai Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar (Various Approaches in the Teaching and Learning Process). Jakarta; Bumi Aksara
Noureen, G., Awan, R. N., & Hijab, F. (2017). Effect of Brain-based Learning on Academic Achievement of VII Graders in Mathematics. Journal of Elementary Education, 27(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.30971/pje.v30i2.88
Novaristiana, R., Rinanto, Y., & Ramli, M. (2019). Scientific Literacy Profile in Biological Science of High school Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7080
OECD. (2006). Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy. A Framework for PISA 2006. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264026407-en
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results Combined Executive Summaries Volume I, II, & III: Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/g222d18af-en
Piper, B., Simmons Zuilkowski, S., Dubeck, M., Jepkemei, E., & King, S. J. (2018). Identifying the Essential Ingredients to Literacy and Numeracy Improvement: Teacher Professional Development and Coaching, Student Textbooks, and Structured Teachers’ Guides. World Development, 106(1), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.018
PISA. (2015). Pisa 2015 Result in focus (p. 16). OECD. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
Ramakrishnan, J., & Annakodi, R. (2015). Effectiveness of Brain-Based Learning Strategy for Enhancing Creativity among IX Standard Pupils. European Academic Research, 2(11), 14837–14843.
Reiska, P., Soika, K., Möllits, A., Rannikmäe, M., & Soobard, R. (2015). Using Concept Mapping Method for Assessing Students’ Scientific Literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177(6), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.357
Rizkita, L., Suwono, H., & Susilo, H. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains SMA Kota Malang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional II Tahun 2016, Kerjasama Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan Dan Kependudukan (PSLK) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Malang, 26 Maret 2016, 1, 771–781.
Robinson, K. M., Dubé, A. K., & Beatch, J. (2017). Children’s Understanding of Additive Concepts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 16–28.
Rose, C., & Nicholl, M. (1997). Accelerated Learning for the 21 Century. Delacorte.
Sagap, Husain, S. N., & Djirimu, M. (2014). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Menggunakan Pilihan Ganda Beralasan Dalam Materi Pokok Sel Pada Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Dampal Selatan (The Analysis of Conceptual Understanding in Biology Subject by Using Multiple Reasoned Choice on Cell Topic. Jurnal E-Jipbiol, 2(3), 1–8.
Saleh, S., & Subramaniam, L. (2018). Effects of Brain-based Teaching Method on Physics Achievement Among Ordinary School Students. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40(3), 580–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.025
Sasmita, N. N. N., Sugiartini, N. N., Ihwani, S., Nurwalidah, & Raksun, A. (2021). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas X SMAN 8 Mataram dengan Melihat Nilai Ketuntasan Ujian Tengah Semester (UTS) Pada Matapelajaran Biologi (Improving the Learning Outcomes of Class X Students of SMAN 8 Mataram by Seeing the Completeness Value of the Mid-Semester Exam (UTS) in Biology Subjects). Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA, 4(4), 183–187. https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jpmpi/article/view/1081
Savan, A. (2009). International Handbook of Education for Spirituality, Care and Wellbeing. In International Handbook of Education for Spirituality, Care and Wellbeing. International Handbooks of Religion and Education (Vol. 3, pp. 1189–1206). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9018-9
Shichida, M. (2014). Whole Brain Power : Kekuatan Pikiran Yang Dapat Mengubah Hidup Manusia. Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Setiawan, R., Aprillia, A., & Magdalena, N. (2020). Analysis of Antecedent Factors in Academic Achievement and Student Retention. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2019-0043
Setiawan, R., Aprillia, A., & Magdalena, N. (2020). Analysis of Antecedent Factors in Academic Achievement and Student Retention. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2019-0043
Tanaka, K., & Watanabe, K. (2013). Effects of Learning With Explicit Elaboration on Implicit Transfer of Visuomotor Sequence Learning. Experimental Brain Research, 228(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3573-6
Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains (Building Scientific Literacy) . Bandung. Humaniora.
Turnip, N. D., Hasruddin, & Sirait, R. (2018). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Materi Archaebacteria dan Eubacteria (Analysis of Students' Concept Understanding of Archaebacteria and Eubacteria Materi). Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 6(4), 199–203.
Utaberta, N., & Hassanpour, B. (2012). Aligning Assessment with Learning Outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60(1), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.372
Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Fan Chiang, S. H., Yang, C. W., & Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students Guided Inquiry With Simulation and Its Relation to School Science Achievement and Scientific Literacy. Computers and Education, 149(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
World Bank Group. (2017). World Report Development 2017; Governance and The Law (Issue c). International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.mmj.3
Yao-Ping Peng, M., & Chen, C. C. (2019). The Effect of Instructor’s Learning Modes on Deep Approach to Student Learning and Learning Outcomes. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(3), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.3.005
Yilmaz, R. M., Topu, F. B., & Tulgar, A. T. (2022). Examining Vocabulary Learning and Retention Levels of Pre-school Children Using Augmented Reality Technology in English Language Learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10916-w
Zheng, L. (2016). A Knowledge Map Approach to Analyzing Knowledge Elaboration in Collaborative Learning. In; Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. In Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education (pp. 19–31). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1972-2_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
